Amid the Ukraine war and bombings of Gaza, reason and civility seem to have given way to greed and cruelty. The recent Gaza ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump offers some optimism, but the agreement is so fragile that bombing could resume at any time without notice.
Meanwhile, Russians are tired of the war with Ukraine and are surrendering in droves. Financial woes, internal rebellions and a supply meltdown might end Russian aggression sooner than Ukrainian drones could destroy oil refineries, air and sea ports and ammunition depots.
Fiery speeches at the 80th UN General Assembly highlighted world leaders’ visions and resolve for a better world. Slovenian President Natasa Pirc Musar condemned Israel’s brutality in Gaza and US hypocrisy. Finnish President Alexander Stubb emphasized the need to balance values, interests and power amid a shifting global order, condemned Russia’s aggression and advocated for significant reform of the UN Security Council.
The strong language at the UN might help turn the world around. After all, cruelty springs from weakness.
Revising the UN Charter and the council requires adoption by two-thirds of the General Assembly and ratification by two-thirds of the member states, including all five permanent members of the council, according to Article 108 of the charter. This requirement for unanimous ratification by the permanent members makes any substantive changes to the charter nearly impossible.
The charter was designed 80 years ago in San Francisco. The aggressors in World War II were excluded from the council, but the world has changed immensely, as two nations who were victims have become the aggressors.
The purpose of the UN is to maintain international peace and security, foster friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation on global challenges, and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. It serves as a platform from which nations can address economic, social and humanitarian issues to help build a more peaceful and prosperous world.
Two reform issues are most pressing: Enhancing democratic legitimacy and inclusivity, and peacekeeping and security.
Taiwan’s UN membership stands out as an indicator whether the global body fulfills or forfeits its purpose. UN Resolution 2758 invited the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to represent Chinese, while leaving open the possibility for the Republic of China (ROC) to stay, just as North and South Korea are both member states.
In 1971, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) overruled his staff’s suggestion to keep the ROC in the UN for the benefit of Taiwanese.
Excluding the 23 million people of Taiwan from the UN goes against the ideal of inclusivity and reduces the representation of Taiwan, a beacon of democracy in Asia, whereas China is an authoritarian regime. The admission of Taiwan to the UN would not only demonstrate body’s will to leave no one behind, but also resolve tensions caused by Chinese aggression to truly ensure global stability by peaceful means.
The obstacles for Taiwan’s return to the UN are two permanent members of the council: Russia and China.
Russia might collapse soon enough. A peace treaty for Russian President Vladimir Putin to surrender should remove the Russian seat in the council.
Meanwhile, democratization is the only way to revive the Chinese economy and rid it of rampant corruption. Then-Chinese premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) in 2012 recognized that without political reform, a repeat of the Cultural Revolution would suffocate the economy.
In contrast to the economic theory of growth culture, Singapore, Taiwan and colonial Hong Kong attest that intrinsic Han culture does not hinder economic success; it is the political system that does.
The possibility of a military coup, political revolt and civil uprising in China are constant rumors on the Internet. An era following the exit of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that allows free speech, opposition parties and military nationalization as desired by the people might arrive sooner or later.
Any new leader seeking political reform would need to dispel the hostility across the Taiwan Strait. Allowing Taiwan’s UN membership to truly ensure stability would win hearts and minds in the democratic world — a surefire way to get international help to avoid China’s economic downward spiral in the foreseeable “lost” decades.
A return to the UN is Taiwan’s path to the future, and a triumph of democracy that furthers Taiwan’s contributions of global health, supply chains, disaster relief and financial strength to international problem solving capability.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
There has been much catastrophizing in Taiwan recently about America becoming more unreliable as a bulwark against Chinese pressure. Some of this has been sparked by debates in Washington about whether the United States should defend Taiwan in event of conflict. There also were understandable anxieties about whether President Trump would sacrifice Taiwan’s interests for a trade deal when he sat down with President Xi (習近平) in late October. On top of that, Taiwan’s opposition political leaders have sought to score political points by attacking the Lai (賴清德) administration for mishandling relations with the United States. Part of this budding anxiety
The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric. On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus. On Friday, in what
On Nov. 8, newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) and Vice Chairman Chi Lin-len (季麟連) attended a memorial for White Terror era victims, during which convicted Chinese Communist Party (CCP) spies such as Wu Shi (吳石) were also honored. Cheng’s participation in the ceremony, which she said was part of her efforts to promote cross-strait reconciliation, has trapped herself and her party into the KMT’s dark past, and risks putting the party back on its old disastrous road. Wu, a lieutenant general who was the Ministry of National Defense’s deputy chief of the general staff, was recruited
RSS