Amid the Ukraine war and bombings of Gaza, reason and civility seem to have given way to greed and cruelty. The recent Gaza ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump offers some optimism, but the agreement is so fragile that bombing could resume at any time without notice.
Meanwhile, Russians are tired of the war with Ukraine and are surrendering in droves. Financial woes, internal rebellions and a supply meltdown might end Russian aggression sooner than Ukrainian drones could destroy oil refineries, air and sea ports and ammunition depots.
Fiery speeches at the 80th UN General Assembly highlighted world leaders’ visions and resolve for a better world. Slovenian President Natasa Pirc Musar condemned Israel’s brutality in Gaza and US hypocrisy. Finnish President Alexander Stubb emphasized the need to balance values, interests and power amid a shifting global order, condemned Russia’s aggression and advocated for significant reform of the UN Security Council.
The strong language at the UN might help turn the world around. After all, cruelty springs from weakness.
Revising the UN Charter and the council requires adoption by two-thirds of the General Assembly and ratification by two-thirds of the member states, including all five permanent members of the council, according to Article 108 of the charter. This requirement for unanimous ratification by the permanent members makes any substantive changes to the charter nearly impossible.
The charter was designed 80 years ago in San Francisco. The aggressors in World War II were excluded from the council, but the world has changed immensely, as two nations who were victims have become the aggressors.
The purpose of the UN is to maintain international peace and security, foster friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation on global challenges, and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. It serves as a platform from which nations can address economic, social and humanitarian issues to help build a more peaceful and prosperous world.
Two reform issues are most pressing: Enhancing democratic legitimacy and inclusivity, and peacekeeping and security.
Taiwan’s UN membership stands out as an indicator whether the global body fulfills or forfeits its purpose. UN Resolution 2758 invited the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to represent Chinese, while leaving open the possibility for the Republic of China (ROC) to stay, just as North and South Korea are both member states.
In 1971, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) overruled his staff’s suggestion to keep the ROC in the UN for the benefit of Taiwanese.
Excluding the 23 million people of Taiwan from the UN goes against the ideal of inclusivity and reduces the representation of Taiwan, a beacon of democracy in Asia, whereas China is an authoritarian regime. The admission of Taiwan to the UN would not only demonstrate body’s will to leave no one behind, but also resolve tensions caused by Chinese aggression to truly ensure global stability by peaceful means.
The obstacles for Taiwan’s return to the UN are two permanent members of the council: Russia and China.
Russia might collapse soon enough. A peace treaty for Russian President Vladimir Putin to surrender should remove the Russian seat in the council.
Meanwhile, democratization is the only way to revive the Chinese economy and rid it of rampant corruption. Then-Chinese premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) in 2012 recognized that without political reform, a repeat of the Cultural Revolution would suffocate the economy.
In contrast to the economic theory of growth culture, Singapore, Taiwan and colonial Hong Kong attest that intrinsic Han culture does not hinder economic success; it is the political system that does.
The possibility of a military coup, political revolt and civil uprising in China are constant rumors on the Internet. An era following the exit of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that allows free speech, opposition parties and military nationalization as desired by the people might arrive sooner or later.
Any new leader seeking political reform would need to dispel the hostility across the Taiwan Strait. Allowing Taiwan’s UN membership to truly ensure stability would win hearts and minds in the democratic world — a surefire way to get international help to avoid China’s economic downward spiral in the foreseeable “lost” decades.
A return to the UN is Taiwan’s path to the future, and a triumph of democracy that furthers Taiwan’s contributions of global health, supply chains, disaster relief and financial strength to international problem solving capability.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS