Amid the Ukraine war and bombings of Gaza, reason and civility seem to have given way to greed and cruelty. The recent Gaza ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump offers some optimism, but the agreement is so fragile that bombing could resume at any time without notice.
Meanwhile, Russians are tired of the war with Ukraine and are surrendering in droves. Financial woes, internal rebellions and a supply meltdown might end Russian aggression sooner than Ukrainian drones could destroy oil refineries, air and sea ports and ammunition depots.
Fiery speeches at the 80th UN General Assembly highlighted world leaders’ visions and resolve for a better world. Slovenian President Natasa Pirc Musar condemned Israel’s brutality in Gaza and US hypocrisy. Finnish President Alexander Stubb emphasized the need to balance values, interests and power amid a shifting global order, condemned Russia’s aggression and advocated for significant reform of the UN Security Council.
The strong language at the UN might help turn the world around. After all, cruelty springs from weakness.
Revising the UN Charter and the council requires adoption by two-thirds of the General Assembly and ratification by two-thirds of the member states, including all five permanent members of the council, according to Article 108 of the charter. This requirement for unanimous ratification by the permanent members makes any substantive changes to the charter nearly impossible.
The charter was designed 80 years ago in San Francisco. The aggressors in World War II were excluded from the council, but the world has changed immensely, as two nations who were victims have become the aggressors.
The purpose of the UN is to maintain international peace and security, foster friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation on global challenges, and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. It serves as a platform from which nations can address economic, social and humanitarian issues to help build a more peaceful and prosperous world.
Two reform issues are most pressing: Enhancing democratic legitimacy and inclusivity, and peacekeeping and security.
Taiwan’s UN membership stands out as an indicator whether the global body fulfills or forfeits its purpose. UN Resolution 2758 invited the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to represent Chinese, while leaving open the possibility for the Republic of China (ROC) to stay, just as North and South Korea are both member states.
In 1971, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) overruled his staff’s suggestion to keep the ROC in the UN for the benefit of Taiwanese.
Excluding the 23 million people of Taiwan from the UN goes against the ideal of inclusivity and reduces the representation of Taiwan, a beacon of democracy in Asia, whereas China is an authoritarian regime. The admission of Taiwan to the UN would not only demonstrate body’s will to leave no one behind, but also resolve tensions caused by Chinese aggression to truly ensure global stability by peaceful means.
The obstacles for Taiwan’s return to the UN are two permanent members of the council: Russia and China.
Russia might collapse soon enough. A peace treaty for Russian President Vladimir Putin to surrender should remove the Russian seat in the council.
Meanwhile, democratization is the only way to revive the Chinese economy and rid it of rampant corruption. Then-Chinese premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) in 2012 recognized that without political reform, a repeat of the Cultural Revolution would suffocate the economy.
In contrast to the economic theory of growth culture, Singapore, Taiwan and colonial Hong Kong attest that intrinsic Han culture does not hinder economic success; it is the political system that does.
The possibility of a military coup, political revolt and civil uprising in China are constant rumors on the Internet. An era following the exit of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that allows free speech, opposition parties and military nationalization as desired by the people might arrive sooner or later.
Any new leader seeking political reform would need to dispel the hostility across the Taiwan Strait. Allowing Taiwan’s UN membership to truly ensure stability would win hearts and minds in the democratic world — a surefire way to get international help to avoid China’s economic downward spiral in the foreseeable “lost” decades.
A return to the UN is Taiwan’s path to the future, and a triumph of democracy that furthers Taiwan’s contributions of global health, supply chains, disaster relief and financial strength to international problem solving capability.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS