Amid the Ukraine war and bombings of Gaza, reason and civility seem to have given way to greed and cruelty. The recent Gaza ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump offers some optimism, but the agreement is so fragile that bombing could resume at any time without notice.
Meanwhile, Russians are tired of the war with Ukraine and are surrendering in droves. Financial woes, internal rebellions and a supply meltdown might end Russian aggression sooner than Ukrainian drones could destroy oil refineries, air and sea ports and ammunition depots.
Fiery speeches at the 80th UN General Assembly highlighted world leaders’ visions and resolve for a better world. Slovenian President Natasa Pirc Musar condemned Israel’s brutality in Gaza and US hypocrisy. Finnish President Alexander Stubb emphasized the need to balance values, interests and power amid a shifting global order, condemned Russia’s aggression and advocated for significant reform of the UN Security Council.
The strong language at the UN might help turn the world around. After all, cruelty springs from weakness.
Revising the UN Charter and the council requires adoption by two-thirds of the General Assembly and ratification by two-thirds of the member states, including all five permanent members of the council, according to Article 108 of the charter. This requirement for unanimous ratification by the permanent members makes any substantive changes to the charter nearly impossible.
The charter was designed 80 years ago in San Francisco. The aggressors in World War II were excluded from the council, but the world has changed immensely, as two nations who were victims have become the aggressors.
The purpose of the UN is to maintain international peace and security, foster friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation on global challenges, and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. It serves as a platform from which nations can address economic, social and humanitarian issues to help build a more peaceful and prosperous world.
Two reform issues are most pressing: Enhancing democratic legitimacy and inclusivity, and peacekeeping and security.
Taiwan’s UN membership stands out as an indicator whether the global body fulfills or forfeits its purpose. UN Resolution 2758 invited the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to represent Chinese, while leaving open the possibility for the Republic of China (ROC) to stay, just as North and South Korea are both member states.
In 1971, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) overruled his staff’s suggestion to keep the ROC in the UN for the benefit of Taiwanese.
Excluding the 23 million people of Taiwan from the UN goes against the ideal of inclusivity and reduces the representation of Taiwan, a beacon of democracy in Asia, whereas China is an authoritarian regime. The admission of Taiwan to the UN would not only demonstrate body’s will to leave no one behind, but also resolve tensions caused by Chinese aggression to truly ensure global stability by peaceful means.
The obstacles for Taiwan’s return to the UN are two permanent members of the council: Russia and China.
Russia might collapse soon enough. A peace treaty for Russian President Vladimir Putin to surrender should remove the Russian seat in the council.
Meanwhile, democratization is the only way to revive the Chinese economy and rid it of rampant corruption. Then-Chinese premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) in 2012 recognized that without political reform, a repeat of the Cultural Revolution would suffocate the economy.
In contrast to the economic theory of growth culture, Singapore, Taiwan and colonial Hong Kong attest that intrinsic Han culture does not hinder economic success; it is the political system that does.
The possibility of a military coup, political revolt and civil uprising in China are constant rumors on the Internet. An era following the exit of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that allows free speech, opposition parties and military nationalization as desired by the people might arrive sooner or later.
Any new leader seeking political reform would need to dispel the hostility across the Taiwan Strait. Allowing Taiwan’s UN membership to truly ensure stability would win hearts and minds in the democratic world — a surefire way to get international help to avoid China’s economic downward spiral in the foreseeable “lost” decades.
A return to the UN is Taiwan’s path to the future, and a triumph of democracy that furthers Taiwan’s contributions of global health, supply chains, disaster relief and financial strength to international problem solving capability.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS