Despite its geopolitical weight, Southeast Asia has rarely been more divided. In separately seeking tariff relief from the US, nations from Malaysia to Indonesia have undermined their collective leverage. They have a chance to present a united front at a regional forum this weekend — a move that would ensure they remain credible as a bloc capable of charting its own future.
US President Donald Trump is attending the 10-member ASEAN meeting in Malaysia, which began yesterday. Sitting at the heart of the Indo-Pacific — a zone central to both US and Chinese strategic ambitions — the region is vital to global trade and security, with a combined GDP of about US$4 trillion.
ASEAN is not living up to its unity in diversity motto. Trump’s “art of the deal” thrives on bilateral bargaining, and many leaders seem eager to play along in the hopes of securing short-term gains.
In the run-up to the summit, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim personally extended an invitation to Trump in an attempt to secure preferential trade terms, despite domestic opposition. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto was caught on a hot mic asking the US leader if he could meet his son, discussing what reportedly appeared to be a business venture. Thailand and Cambodia, locked in a volatile border dispute, credited Trump for mediating an uneasy truce. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet even said he is nominating the US president for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Bilateral dealmaking has helped some Southeast Asian states avoid the worst-case scenario from Trump’s tariffs, but this approach is not sustainable.
Each concession chips away at the bloc’s shared influence, said Joanne Lin, a senior fellow and coordinator of the ASEAN Studies Centre at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
“The absence of a free-trade agreement between the two sides does not mean there are not other ways for the region to act collectively,” she said. “Members can still coordinate positions and signal shared principles on trade. That would carry weight.”
ASEAN’s divisions extend beyond trade. The group has failed to meaningfully respond to the Thai-Cambodia dispute and the Myanmar crisis, despite various high-level meetings.
Singaporean Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan called these setbacks “not just for peace and stability, but for the credibility of ASEAN.”
The bloc remains similarly split on how to address Beijing’s growing aggressiveness on the South China Sea.
The consequences are showing up in public sentiment.
About 35 percent of respondents across the region view ASEAN as too slow to handle fast-moving crises, and fear it risks sliding into irrelevance, the institute’s State of Southeast Asia 2025 survey showed.
Southeast Asia has always been at the heart of great power rivalry, but the stakes are rising as the US and China compete more fiercely for influence. Trump’s presence in Malaysia could open the door to a broader US-ASEAN trade agreement, helping to ease the bloc’s economic anxieties. China, the group’s largest trading partner, is sending Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) as it pushes for an upgraded free trade deal before the end of the year.
Washington and Beijing are due to hold talks at the summit. Newly elected Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is expected to make her diplomatic debut at the summit. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is reportedly skipping the gathering.
The forum comes days before Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) are scheduled to meet at the APEC summit in South Korea. That encounter, if it happens, could define the trajectory of US-China relations. Any thaw or escalation is going to directly impact Southeast Asia.
To avoid being reduced to a pawn in the superpower competition, ASEAN needs to act on tariffs and territorial disputes. The bloc could present Washington with a joint tariff framework and outline shared principles. Granted, this would require coordination among states used to bilateral dealmaking, but the stakes are high enough. Malaysia, as this year’s chair, has taken a step in that direction through its new Geo-Economics Council, which is exploring ways to deepen regional cooperation.
ASEAN also has the tools to rebuild a credible way to manage border or maritime disputes. Past efforts were largely symbolic, but they proved cooperation is possible.
Trump might leave Malaysia with another headline about deals and diplomacy. ASEAN risks leaving without agency. That is far worse for its future than tough tariffs.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS