Beijing has come out in support of incoming Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), particularly her call for Taiwanese to proudly say “I am Chinese.” It marks a shift in their Taiwan strategy, moving away from military threats and toward the infiltration of institutions and manipulation of narratives.
The Republic of China is downplayed as a nation, and the democratic process is used as a tool for the legitimization of a pro-Chinese government. There is a Taiwanese role to play in promoting “one China, two systems.” The risk of Weimarization is real — democratic structures are being wielded by anti-democratic forces to erode Taiwan’s resilience and sovereignty.
It is the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) long-term goal to make Taiwan into another Hong Kong with a system of government that follows Beijing’s desires without being subject to direct rule. A minority of voices in opposition might serve as a front for democracy, but ultimately would not encroach on Beijing’s “long arm” of control.
A strategy of soft unification is less likely to incite a crisis or US intervention, but still undermines Taiwan as a stronghold of democracy and support for the US narrative ambition for freedom in the Indo-Pacific region.
The “Hong Kongification” of Taiwan would lead to legislative and judicial erosion, marginalization of social movements, and media suppression, driving a degradation of democratic institutions and ultimately the imposition of a quasi-unification model under CCP terms.
It would not only affect Taiwan, but also be an attack on the free order of the broader Western Pacific. If the first island chain fractures, US military capacity for reconnaissance and cooperative intelligence operations around Taiwan is likely to be interrupted — Japan’s line of defense and the situation in the South and East China Seas would tilt in Beijing’s favor.
For the US to fail to notice or act would mean facing geopolitical defeat without a fight. If Taiwan’s political system buckles, it is the beginning of democracy’s retreat from the Indo-Pacific region and the supplanting of US democratic ideals with Beijing’s peaceful unification rhetoric. The White House is not just a leader of a military alliance, but a representative for democracy. It must be strategic and forward-thinking. A critical measure would be to establish diplomatic relations with Taiwan, which would provide meaningful support for its institutional security.
The KMT chair election was the typical reshuffling of a political party — it was a watershed moment for Taiwanese democracy. If President William Lai (賴清德) can muster an effective strategy to regain control of the narrative, resist the infiltration of domestic discourse, and prevent total system failure, Taiwan might become a beacon for democracy.
If the White House can keep in step and offer measures for the protection of democratic institutions, it would not only serve to defend Taiwan, but also stabilize the wider regional order. Conversely, if nothing is done, Taiwan is set to face the same fate as Hong Kong and watch as its democracy is swallowed up at the ballot box while the Indo-Pacific region’s defenses crumble.
Is the White House ready? Alarm bells are beginning to sound.
Joshua Tin is an economist.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
The topic of increased intergenerational conflict has been making headlines in the past few months, showcasing a problem that would only grow as Taiwan approaches “super-aged society” status. A striking example of that tension erupted on the Taipei MRT late last month, when an apparently able-bodied passenger kicked a 73-year-old woman across the width of the carriage. The septuagenarian had berated and hit the young commuter with her bag for sitting in a priority seat, despite regular seats being available. A video of the incident went viral online. Altercations over the yielding of MRT seats are not common, but they are
RSS