Beijing has come out in support of incoming Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), particularly her call for Taiwanese to proudly say “I am Chinese.” It marks a shift in their Taiwan strategy, moving away from military threats and toward the infiltration of institutions and manipulation of narratives.
The Republic of China is downplayed as a nation, and the democratic process is used as a tool for the legitimization of a pro-Chinese government. There is a Taiwanese role to play in promoting “one China, two systems.” The risk of Weimarization is real — democratic structures are being wielded by anti-democratic forces to erode Taiwan’s resilience and sovereignty.
It is the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) long-term goal to make Taiwan into another Hong Kong with a system of government that follows Beijing’s desires without being subject to direct rule. A minority of voices in opposition might serve as a front for democracy, but ultimately would not encroach on Beijing’s “long arm” of control.
A strategy of soft unification is less likely to incite a crisis or US intervention, but still undermines Taiwan as a stronghold of democracy and support for the US narrative ambition for freedom in the Indo-Pacific region.
The “Hong Kongification” of Taiwan would lead to legislative and judicial erosion, marginalization of social movements, and media suppression, driving a degradation of democratic institutions and ultimately the imposition of a quasi-unification model under CCP terms.
It would not only affect Taiwan, but also be an attack on the free order of the broader Western Pacific. If the first island chain fractures, US military capacity for reconnaissance and cooperative intelligence operations around Taiwan is likely to be interrupted — Japan’s line of defense and the situation in the South and East China Seas would tilt in Beijing’s favor.
For the US to fail to notice or act would mean facing geopolitical defeat without a fight. If Taiwan’s political system buckles, it is the beginning of democracy’s retreat from the Indo-Pacific region and the supplanting of US democratic ideals with Beijing’s peaceful unification rhetoric. The White House is not just a leader of a military alliance, but a representative for democracy. It must be strategic and forward-thinking. A critical measure would be to establish diplomatic relations with Taiwan, which would provide meaningful support for its institutional security.
The KMT chair election was the typical reshuffling of a political party — it was a watershed moment for Taiwanese democracy. If President William Lai (賴清德) can muster an effective strategy to regain control of the narrative, resist the infiltration of domestic discourse, and prevent total system failure, Taiwan might become a beacon for democracy.
If the White House can keep in step and offer measures for the protection of democratic institutions, it would not only serve to defend Taiwan, but also stabilize the wider regional order. Conversely, if nothing is done, Taiwan is set to face the same fate as Hong Kong and watch as its democracy is swallowed up at the ballot box while the Indo-Pacific region’s defenses crumble.
Is the White House ready? Alarm bells are beginning to sound.
Joshua Tin is an economist.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS