In the past few weeks, I have been following the controversy surrounding Holger Chen (陳之漢) — commonly known as Kuan Chang (館長) — the fitness influencer and YouTuber who, during a live stream, suggested the beheading of President William Lai (賴清德). The Taipei Times covered the story closely, detailing the legal response and the public debate it provoked. Reading those reports made me pause. Language, whether spoken in anger, jest, or political fervor, can slip easily from expression into incitement. Speech is never just communication; it shapes how people think, react and relate to one another.
Chen has insisted he never meant to threaten anyone, claiming his words were misinterpreted. Some viewers might accept that, seeing his statement as part of the exaggerated style that fuels many online personalities. Yet intention is only one part of meaning. Even if he did not mean any harm, his words had consequences — such as fear, anger and discussion — that were out of his control. Words carry weight. Once spoken, they often take on meanings beyond the speaker’s intent.
In linguistics, we talk about implicature and perlocutionary effect — how a statement generates meaning and responses beyond its literal sense. Chen’s comments were not harmless talk. They had social and political effects. They drew attention from prosecutors, dominated media coverage and contributed to unease about political hostility in Taiwan. I am not suggesting that every rash comment online deserves punishment. Still, when speech turns violent imagery, it shifts from opinion into something that could influence public behavior and sentiment.
The Taipei Times editorial “Threats and freedom of speech” (Oct. 10, page 8) reminded readers that freedom of speech in Taiwan is not without limits. Free expression exists so citizens can question power, share ideas and hold leaders accountable.
Yet it also relies on a shared understanding that speech should not intimidate or threaten others. As contributor Lin Han (林志翰) observed (“Beheading comments problematic,” Oct. 11, page 8), threats toward public officials can erode trust in the institutions that sustain democracy. I agree; language that undermines that trust weakens the foundation on which civic dialogue depends.
Should freedom of speech have boundaries? I believe it should. Not to silence dissent, but to balance liberty with responsibility. Freedom is not a blank check; it works best when paired with awareness of its effects on others. Practicing that awareness means recognizing that words, like actions, shape the public sphere.
This controversy is also a moment to reflect on the civic culture. It is not enough to defend the right to speak; people must consider how speech shapes others and the spaces they inhabit. Healthy debate depends on more than laws and institutions; it depends on citizens who understand that liberty carries obligation. Chen’s case shows that democracy relies on thoughtful expression as much as legal rights.
Freedom is not the absence of consequences. In a society that values open discussion and participation, thinking before we speak helps keep freedom meaningful. Chen’s livestream might have been a performance or provocation, but its effects are real. We cannot unhear it, and we cannot ignore what it might inspire. Democracy, like language, is alive; it responds to what people say and do. That is why words always matter and why we must reckon with them honestly.
Aiden Yeh is a professor in the English Department at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
The topic of increased intergenerational conflict has been making headlines in the past few months, showcasing a problem that would only grow as Taiwan approaches “super-aged society” status. A striking example of that tension erupted on the Taipei MRT late last month, when an apparently able-bodied passenger kicked a 73-year-old woman across the width of the carriage. The septuagenarian had berated and hit the young commuter with her bag for sitting in a priority seat, despite regular seats being available. A video of the incident went viral online. Altercations over the yielding of MRT seats are not common, but they are
RSS