No single word describes the challenge that China poses for British foreign policy.
There is threat and opportunity; a requirement to engage and an imperative to be guarded. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) represses dissent and pursues its interests overseas with coercive nationalist determination. It is not a regime with which the UK could build a relationship based on common values.
However, China is also a superpower with near-monopoly control of some mineral resources and pre-eminence in important manufacturing supply chains. Trusting friendship is not an option; hostile rejection is unrealistic. It is not easy to manage relations through private diplomacy, let alone under public scrutiny. However, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government has looked especially awkward in its response to the collapse of a high-profile espionage case, involving the alleged transmission of secrets from inside parliament to Chinese officials.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) dropped the case against two men, a parliamentary researcher and a teacher working in China.
Both denied wrongdoing.
The CPS said a conviction could not be secured if China was not named in government witness statements as a threat to national security — ostensibly a requirement of the Official Secrets Act.
Opposition parties have cried foul. There are ample policy papers and ministerial statements going back many years attesting to the threat China poses. The suspicion has been raised that political pressure was applied to drop the case through fear of offending Beijing and spoiling economic relations.
Ministers rejected that claim and accused the Conservatives of failing to fix flaws in the act when they were in power.
In parliament on Wednesday, Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said the whole affair “stinks of a cover-up.”
The prime minister responded that the Tory leader was “slinging mud.”
He committed to publish witness statements that he said support the government’s account of events.
Something is clearly amiss if the CPS thought there was an espionage case to answer, but could not bring it to trial. In a climate of endemic mistrust in politics, it would be prudent of Badenoch to beware leaping from scepticism to conspiracy theory. By the same token, if wider diplomatic and commercial anxieties really are unconnected to the case, the government should have been more transparent, earlier.
Partisan rhetoric has heated the debate without shedding much light on the underlying issue. There is more consensus on this question than the tone of party political exchanges over the past few days suggested.
In office, Conservative ministers, including Badenoch, picked their words carefully when describing the risks of overexposure to the CCP’s espionage and dependence on Chinese technology, often to the frustration of hawkish backbenchers. The suppression of political freedoms in Hong Kong was not opposed as robustly as pro-democracy activists there deserved.
Managing relations with an assertive superpower is complex. Judicious language does not necessarily indicate naivety about the danger, but diplomatic protocol should not prevent candor about the limits to engagement with a regime that is often hostile to fundamental British interests.
The Labour government is not the first to send mixed signals on this point. If Starmer has a clear sense of how to strike the balance between trade with China and national security interests, ending confusion over the failed espionage case would be a good way to spell it out.
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long