Beauty-enhancing apps, artificial intelligence (AI) image editing and deepfake technologies have become widespread, allowing any photo to be altered to contain scenes of kissing, hugging or even more intimate or absurd situations. Although we are aware that these images are fake, we cannot stop them from going viral online and causing misunderstandings.
Many have called for legislation to halt this trend, but in practice, hundreds of millions of photos have already been uploaded to social media platforms such as Facebook and Google, with data scattered all across the cloud. No matter how strict the legislation, it is nonetheless difficult to prevent the existence of anonymous accounts, overseas platforms or AI-generated fake images that can be created rapidly.
This is quite similar to lying. We cannot prohibit others from lying, but we can strengthen societal immunity — and in the digital age, that so-called “immunity” is digital literacy education.
The first step of digital literacy education is to cultivate the ability to detect fake content. When we encounter shocking photos or videos, we must not immediately believe them — instead, we should first observe whether the lighting and shadows are realistic or proportions are distorted. We can even use reverse image searches to verify their authenticity.
The second step is developing an attitude of rational skepticism: We must not immediately believe harmful images of someone just because we like or dislike that person.
The third step is media literacy, that is, understanding the differences between news, advertisements and rumors, and recognizing that algorithms often keep us trapped in echo chambers.
Finally, we must possess a fundamental awareness of laws and ethics, and understand that spreading false images might contravene the law and infringe upon others’ portrait rights.
Of course, the government still needs to promote legislation requiring online platforms to promptly remove malicious deepfake content, but long-term investment in education is all the more crucial. Starting from junior high and high school, media literacy should be incorporated into the curriculum to ensure that the coming generation learns to verify information and think critically, rather than be misled by fake images.
The greatest threat of misinformation is not technology, but ignorant people who believe and disseminate that misinformation without thinking. Only by establishing a digital immune system for all citizens — thereby making a collectively smarter and cool-headed society — can we safeguard truth and reason in an era flooded by fake images.
Hsiao Hsi-huei is a freelance writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS