Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks.
In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called Lai “reckless” for reiterating Taiwan’s sovereignty in a June speech, which Goldstein said angered China and would likely come back to burn the US.
The same day Time published an op-ed by retired Chinese People’s Liberation Army senior colonel Zhou Bo (周波), who claimed that “time is not on the American side thanks to China’s growing [military] capability,” adding that Trump should pressure Taiwan to accept the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Goldstein’s and Zhou’s articles are part of escalating cognitive warfare narratives by pro-China forces to compel Washington to give up its support for Taiwan in exchange for potential trade concessions from Beijing. They also seek to spread skepticism of the US in Taiwan and build momentum for China ahead of the meeting.
In criticizing Lai, Goldstein quoted Taipei Times columnist Courtney Donovan Smith (“Lai’s ‘nation’ speech a multi-faceted strategic strike,” June 28, page 12) as saying that “never before has a Taiwanese president devoted an entire speech to laying out clearly, point-by-point and unequivocally how Taiwan is unquestionably a sovereign nation.”
Smith’s column actually concluded that Lai delivered a “strategically brilliant speech,” showing how Taiwan meets the definition of a state codified in the 1933 Montevideo Convention that soundly refuted Beijing’s false claims on Taiwan. Lai’s speech would only be considered “reckless” for those oblivious to Taiwan’s sovereignty, or to those fearful of Taiwan’s democracy and self-determination to decide its own future.
While the “Taiwan issue” would unsurprisingly be brought up in the meeting, as Xi has made the most of any opportunity to reiterate China’s ambitious claims over Taiwan, Trump would likely seek to ease tensions in the region. Following the Gaza peace plan and Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire agreement, Trump would be eager to promote peace in the Indo-Pacific region. Any discussion of Taiwan at the meeting should be focused on de-escalating cross-strait and regional tensions.
Trump on Friday last week said he would bring up Taiwan with Xi, and expressed “a lot of respect for Taiwan.” China would not make any move on Taiwan, the US president said, adding that “it would be very dangerous for them to do.”
US trade representatives said the US aims to reach a trade deal in the meeting, covering tariffs, fentanyl, rare earths, TikTok and agriculture products. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressed that Taiwan should not be worried about being used as “a bargaining chip,” adding that the US would not seek a favorable trade agreement with China at the price of “walking away from Taiwan.”
Taiwan has long been a sensitive issue in US-China relations, but not necessarily an urgent one, especially for a China facing a weakening economy and domestic market slump. Any deliberate move by Xi on Taiwan in the meeting with Trump would only prove that China is the true “reckless” troublemaker.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did