Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her.
For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking.
What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did not try to yank her away from her position, yet he did nudge the conversation toward “dialing things down a notch.”
That subtle shift matters — not because it changes Japan’s policy, but because it exposes Trump’s deep reluctance to plant a firm flag on anything Taiwan-related right now.
The reluctance is not random. It is part of a pattern. If Trump’s first administration was marked by loud, fiery confrontations with Beijing — especially after the COVID-19 pandemic upended the global order — his political comeback has been the opposite.
His instinct today is transactional, not ideological. In Trump’s worldview, China is less a hostile rival to contain and more a massive bargaining partner holding the keys to economic wins he desperately wants to claim.
That is precisely why his careful silence on Taiwan should worry everyone.
After his latest conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Trump released a message so polished it might as well have been written by a bored intern with a thesaurus.The usual Trumpian verbal fireworks were gone. Instead, every line read like it had been scrubbed for anything that could accidentally irritate Beijing or complicate his quest for trade concessions.
China has dangled promises — more US farm imports, maybe a loosening on rare earths restrictions — but nothing concrete has landed. Trump wants those wins. Until he gets them, he clearly sees no upside in poking the Taiwan issue with anything sharper than a feather.
Some analysts spin this as a clever strategy: “Deterrence without drama,” or “quiet strength,” but anyone watching US-China dynamics knows that the truth is much simpler.
The two sides are easing into a thaw. Plans for mutual visits are already forming. Business interests on both sides are pushing for calmer waters.
In that environment, Trump’s caution is not some 4D chess move — it is the political equivalent of bubble-wrapping the furniture and hoping that nothing breaks before the deal closes.
That is why the notion that Trump would reliably “stand tough on China” is becoming less persuasive by the day. Could he swing back to confrontation? Of course. He has a history of snapping from warm handshakes to cold hostility when it suits him.
However, such shifts have always been driven by personal political need, not strategic conviction. The first time he broke with Xi, the trigger was domestic: The pandemic wrecked his re-election prospects. If he turns again next year, the trigger will almost certainly be transactional — Beijing not offering enough or demanding something Trump cannot afford to give.
There lies the real danger for Taiwan: The “something” China wants most is rhetorical validation of its narrative. A single phrase from Trump — however symbolic — could send tremors through the region. A leader who prioritizes economic optics over long-term strategy might find such a trade tempting.
Taipei knows this and the conclusion is unavoidable: Being cautious about Trump is not the same as being skeptical of the US. Support for Taiwan among US institutions and alliances, as well as across party lines, remains far steadier than Trump’s moods.
In the end, Takaichi’s comments did more than stir Beijing’s anger. They pulled back the curtain on Trump’s risk-averse calculus. What he is not saying about Taiwan speaks louder than what he ever has — and that silence is its own bright red flag.
Bonnie Yushih Liao is an assistant professor in the Department of Diplomacy and International Relations at Tamkang University.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS