The recent demand by US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick that Taiwan invest massively in the US and shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad must be called what it is: coercion masquerading as partnership. Far from strengthening Taiwan’s security, such a move would dismantle Taiwan’s most vital defense asset: the “silicon shield.”
Taiwan’s unrivaled dominance in advanced semiconductors is not just an economic fact; it is our strategic lifeline.
This so-called silicon shield ensures that the world depends on Taiwan, making it indispensable to allies and a dangerous gamble for adversaries. It is our deterrent, our leverage and our survival mechanism in a hostile geopolitical environment.
Yet Washington’s proposal would directly erode this shield. Stripping Taiwan of its production dominance would dilute our indispensability and make us more vulnerable, not less. A Taiwan that no longer controls the core of global semiconductor supply chains is a Taiwan that risks becoming expendable in the calculus of great powers.
What is most disturbing is the lack of logic at the heart of Lutnick’s demand. On the one hand, Washington insists it seeks to defend Taiwan. On the other, it pressures Taiwan to weaken the very mechanism that deters aggression. This contradiction is dangerous. It suggests that the US views Taiwan less as a strategic partner and more as a subcontractor to be drained for US interests.
Realism in international politics teaches us that survival depends on power, leverage and self-help — not on abstract promises. For Taiwan, semiconductors are our power and our leverage. To give that up in exchange for vague reassurances would be an act of self-destruction.
If Washington truly cares about Taiwan’s survival, it must recognize that weakening our silicon shield is tantamount to undermining the very rationale for defending us.
Taiwan is asked to pour billions of US dollars into US projects with no proportional security guarantee in return. If such demands persist, they would corrode trust and cast doubt on the credibility of the US’ commitments.
Destroying Taiwan’s silicon shield will not make the world safer. It will make Taiwan more vulnerable, embolden aggressors and destabilize the global balance of power. If Washington wishes to be seen as a reliable partner, it must abandon these coercive tactics and pursue genuine collaboration — through joint research, talent exchange and concrete security guarantees.
Simon H. Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS