US job creation has stalled and, despite the curbs on migration, unemployment is rising. Tariffs are pushing up the cost of imports, and US President Donald Trump is at war with the head of his own central bank and wants him out.
However, traders on Wall Street are not bothered that inflation is above the target or that growth is slowing. Share prices are testing new record levels on an almost daily basis. US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, the man Trump wants to be rid of, says stocks are “fairly highly valued,” which is an understatement if ever there was one. By historical standards, stocks are quite highly valued. There is trouble — perhaps big trouble — ahead.
Recessions happen rarely and the same goes for financial crashes. Both are predicted more often than they materialize. Leaving to one side the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been 17 years since there was a prolonged fall in share prices. Memories of the slump that followed the collapse of Lehman Brothers 17 years ago this month have dimmed. Traders in their 20s and 30s have little or no experience of what a genuine financial market panic feels like.
Illustration: Yusha
That is the first warning sign: The longer the period between crises, the greater the complacency, the sense that the good times would go on forever. Those who note that all previous booms have ended in painful busts are ignored. The old lie — it is different this time — is trotted out.
The belief that the party is going to continue has pushed share prices ever higher in New York and London, even though the reasons for the optimism are tenuous. In the UK, the economy is barely growing while inflation is running at almost double the Bank of England’s 2 percent target. As was the case last year, constant speculation about tax rises to be announced in the budget is hitting consumer and business confidence.
The record-breaking run of share prices on Wall Street is the result of a bet that artificial intelligence can raise the economy’s growth rate. That might happen, but it might be years before the impact is felt. The same was said of the information technology boom that propelled share prices to dizzying heights in the late 1990s. It was not different that time either.
No two market crashes are alike. The current state of affairs feels different from 2008, when the crash was caused by the overexposure of banks to the US housing market, avnd turbocharged by the widespread use of new financial instruments that were supposed to reduce risk, but did the opposite. If there are parallels, they are with the recession-triggered stock market setbacks of the 1970s and early 1980s, when downturns were deliberately engineered to combat high inflation.
All of which makes the power struggle between Trump and Powell pivotal. Despite what the president might say, the performance of the US economy is mediocre at best, although the weaknesses have been disguised by the fact that the better-off have been doing just fine. The top 10 percent of earners account for almost half of consumer spending — the highest level since the late 1980s.
The bias toward the rich is nothing new but creates its own risks. Exposure to the stock market has never been higher, with 30 percent of the wealth of Americans accounted for by shares. Since share ownership is concentrated among the better-off, the US economy is relying on the Wall Street boom continuing, and for the rich to carry on spending their gains.
Americans trying to get by on low and middle incomes are not so fortunate. Since the end of the pandemic, they have seen their real incomes pretty much flatline. Wall Street analyst Mark Zandi said the fate of the US economy lies in the hands of the well-to-do: “As long as they keep spending, the economy should avoid recession, but if they turn more cautious, for whatever reason, the economy has a big problem.”
One obvious reason for the rich to turn more cautious would be a fall in share prices. If that happened, their wealth would take a hit and they would spend less. Growth would slow. Add in the negative impact of tariffs and there would be a genuine threat of recession next year. In those circumstances, Powell and his colleagues at the Federal Reserve would be expected to support share prices by cutting interest rates. Indeed, it is Wall Street’s certainty that the US central bank is going to bow to Trump’s pressure to do so that is preventing share prices from falling.
Since the 1970s, central banks have prized low inflation over full employment, which has been good for owners of capital but not so good for labor. As TS Lombard analyst Dario Perkins puts it, just as trade unions were the custodians of full employment immediately after World War II, so central banks were the custodians of neoliberalism. While ostensibly independent, they made sure that capital triumphed in the fight against labor — and carried on winning. In both the global financial crisis of 2008 and the pandemic, central banks took aggressive action to put a floor under share prices.
Powell might deliver, but he might not. The Federal Reserve has twin targets: to keep inflation at 2 percent over time and to support employment. Inflation is running at just under 3 percent so there is a choice: Keep interest rates higher than the markets expect in order to tame inflation, or ditch the inflation target to justify interest rate cuts.
Either way, the prospects are not good. If the Fed resists the pressure for cheaper borrowing, it increases the chances of the US economy falling into recession. If it bows to the pressure, it might keep the stock market bubble inflated but at the risk of higher inflation. That could trigger a backlash from the bond markets, which in effect set the interest rates for mortgages and servicing the US national debt, currently 124 percent of GDP.
It is always easier to be wise after the event and identify the causes of stock market crashes with the benefit of hindsight. There should be no such problem this time. In the months to come, we shall see whether the bull market can survive Trump’s attempt to set US interest rates from the White House. Wall Street seems untroubled by this. It should not be.
Larry Elliott is a Guardian columnist.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS