The Central State Museum of the Republic of Kazakhstan was scheduled to host “Shifting Grounds: Dissonance, Memory and Landscape as a Site of Becoming,” a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition curated by artist Wang Chun-chi (王俊琪) and supported by the Ministry of Culture.
The exhibition — set for Sept. 12 to Wednesday next week — promised to be groundbreaking: Eight Taiwanese artists were invited to explore ways to decode Taiwan’s history, reconstruct the narrative, and picture the future in the shifting terrain of geopolitics and social conditions.
The museum embraced the curatorial vision enthusiastically and the exhibition was hailed as Kazakhstan’s first-ever Taiwan art showcase — a milestone moment that drew attention from local media and art communities.
Then, just before the opening, the museum abruptly pulled the plug. The official excuse was “venue maintenance.”
The exhibition had been formally presented as a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition, yet while citing repairs, the museum continued to host other events.
Local insiders discreetly confirmed what many suspected: The cancelation was the result of pressure from China.
The blow was devastating for the artists and curators’ team, who suddenly found their months of work erased by political maneuvering.
It shows that the comforting slogan “politics is politics, art is art” is, under the shadow of China’s interference, a fiction. Beijing treats art as politics by other means — and it would silence Taiwan whenever it can.
The incident shows that neither the participating artists and curators from Taiwan nor the local partners in Kazakhstan had anticipated what would unfold.
How should Taiwan respond? For too long, the nation’s cultural diplomacy has focused on safe and familiar partners. Taiwanese rarely ask how to manage risk, anticipate sabotage or script responses to pressure campaigns. This cancelation lays bare the need to change that. Rather than shrinking back, Taiwan must push harder, reach farther and take its art to places Beijing would prefer it to be invisible.
Yes, this was a setback — but a valuable one. By bringing Taiwan’s art into Kazakhstan’s public imagination, even briefly, Taiwan sparked curiosity in a region that has had little contact with it. The exhibition’s absence left a hole, but also an opening: people would now wonder what they were not allowed to see. Unfulfilled anticipation is powerful and cannot be erased.
The experience should compel Taiwan to rethink its cultural diplomacy strategy. The shift in Taiwan’s economic and geopolitical standing gives the nation that chance. In the early 1970s, the Chinese Communist Party cracked open its path into the international community through the unlikely medium of table tennis. Could Taiwan carve out a unique form of “Ping-Pong diplomacy” through art?
If so, this is about more than recognition. It is about claiming the right to tell Taiwan’s own stories — its art, culture and history — on the world stage. That is a struggle worth pursuing, even if sometimes the road begins with what looks like failure.
China can cancel a show. It can pressure museums, whisper threats and wave contracts away, but what it cannot cancel is Taiwan’s determination to tell its own story — and to fight for the right to be seen, heard and recognized on the world stage.
Sheng Bo-chen is an independent curator and art critic.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
RSS