The Central State Museum of the Republic of Kazakhstan was scheduled to host “Shifting Grounds: Dissonance, Memory and Landscape as a Site of Becoming,” a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition curated by artist Wang Chun-chi (王俊琪) and supported by the Ministry of Culture.
The exhibition — set for Sept. 12 to Wednesday next week — promised to be groundbreaking: Eight Taiwanese artists were invited to explore ways to decode Taiwan’s history, reconstruct the narrative, and picture the future in the shifting terrain of geopolitics and social conditions.
The museum embraced the curatorial vision enthusiastically and the exhibition was hailed as Kazakhstan’s first-ever Taiwan art showcase — a milestone moment that drew attention from local media and art communities.
Then, just before the opening, the museum abruptly pulled the plug. The official excuse was “venue maintenance.”
The exhibition had been formally presented as a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition, yet while citing repairs, the museum continued to host other events.
Local insiders discreetly confirmed what many suspected: The cancelation was the result of pressure from China.
The blow was devastating for the artists and curators’ team, who suddenly found their months of work erased by political maneuvering.
It shows that the comforting slogan “politics is politics, art is art” is, under the shadow of China’s interference, a fiction. Beijing treats art as politics by other means — and it would silence Taiwan whenever it can.
The incident shows that neither the participating artists and curators from Taiwan nor the local partners in Kazakhstan had anticipated what would unfold.
How should Taiwan respond? For too long, the nation’s cultural diplomacy has focused on safe and familiar partners. Taiwanese rarely ask how to manage risk, anticipate sabotage or script responses to pressure campaigns. This cancelation lays bare the need to change that. Rather than shrinking back, Taiwan must push harder, reach farther and take its art to places Beijing would prefer it to be invisible.
Yes, this was a setback — but a valuable one. By bringing Taiwan’s art into Kazakhstan’s public imagination, even briefly, Taiwan sparked curiosity in a region that has had little contact with it. The exhibition’s absence left a hole, but also an opening: people would now wonder what they were not allowed to see. Unfulfilled anticipation is powerful and cannot be erased.
The experience should compel Taiwan to rethink its cultural diplomacy strategy. The shift in Taiwan’s economic and geopolitical standing gives the nation that chance. In the early 1970s, the Chinese Communist Party cracked open its path into the international community through the unlikely medium of table tennis. Could Taiwan carve out a unique form of “Ping-Pong diplomacy” through art?
If so, this is about more than recognition. It is about claiming the right to tell Taiwan’s own stories — its art, culture and history — on the world stage. That is a struggle worth pursuing, even if sometimes the road begins with what looks like failure.
China can cancel a show. It can pressure museums, whisper threats and wave contracts away, but what it cannot cancel is Taiwan’s determination to tell its own story — and to fight for the right to be seen, heard and recognized on the world stage.
Sheng Bo-chen is an independent curator and art critic.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS