The Central State Museum of the Republic of Kazakhstan was scheduled to host “Shifting Grounds: Dissonance, Memory and Landscape as a Site of Becoming,” a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition curated by artist Wang Chun-chi (王俊琪) and supported by the Ministry of Culture.
The exhibition — set for Sept. 12 to Wednesday next week — promised to be groundbreaking: Eight Taiwanese artists were invited to explore ways to decode Taiwan’s history, reconstruct the narrative, and picture the future in the shifting terrain of geopolitics and social conditions.
The museum embraced the curatorial vision enthusiastically and the exhibition was hailed as Kazakhstan’s first-ever Taiwan art showcase — a milestone moment that drew attention from local media and art communities.
Then, just before the opening, the museum abruptly pulled the plug. The official excuse was “venue maintenance.”
The exhibition had been formally presented as a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition, yet while citing repairs, the museum continued to host other events.
Local insiders discreetly confirmed what many suspected: The cancelation was the result of pressure from China.
The blow was devastating for the artists and curators’ team, who suddenly found their months of work erased by political maneuvering.
It shows that the comforting slogan “politics is politics, art is art” is, under the shadow of China’s interference, a fiction. Beijing treats art as politics by other means — and it would silence Taiwan whenever it can.
The incident shows that neither the participating artists and curators from Taiwan nor the local partners in Kazakhstan had anticipated what would unfold.
How should Taiwan respond? For too long, the nation’s cultural diplomacy has focused on safe and familiar partners. Taiwanese rarely ask how to manage risk, anticipate sabotage or script responses to pressure campaigns. This cancelation lays bare the need to change that. Rather than shrinking back, Taiwan must push harder, reach farther and take its art to places Beijing would prefer it to be invisible.
Yes, this was a setback — but a valuable one. By bringing Taiwan’s art into Kazakhstan’s public imagination, even briefly, Taiwan sparked curiosity in a region that has had little contact with it. The exhibition’s absence left a hole, but also an opening: people would now wonder what they were not allowed to see. Unfulfilled anticipation is powerful and cannot be erased.
The experience should compel Taiwan to rethink its cultural diplomacy strategy. The shift in Taiwan’s economic and geopolitical standing gives the nation that chance. In the early 1970s, the Chinese Communist Party cracked open its path into the international community through the unlikely medium of table tennis. Could Taiwan carve out a unique form of “Ping-Pong diplomacy” through art?
If so, this is about more than recognition. It is about claiming the right to tell Taiwan’s own stories — its art, culture and history — on the world stage. That is a struggle worth pursuing, even if sometimes the road begins with what looks like failure.
China can cancel a show. It can pressure museums, whisper threats and wave contracts away, but what it cannot cancel is Taiwan’s determination to tell its own story — and to fight for the right to be seen, heard and recognized on the world stage.
Sheng Bo-chen is an independent curator and art critic.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS