The Central State Museum of the Republic of Kazakhstan was scheduled to host “Shifting Grounds: Dissonance, Memory and Landscape as a Site of Becoming,” a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition curated by artist Wang Chun-chi (王俊琪) and supported by the Ministry of Culture.
The exhibition — set for Sept. 12 to Wednesday next week — promised to be groundbreaking: Eight Taiwanese artists were invited to explore ways to decode Taiwan’s history, reconstruct the narrative, and picture the future in the shifting terrain of geopolitics and social conditions.
The museum embraced the curatorial vision enthusiastically and the exhibition was hailed as Kazakhstan’s first-ever Taiwan art showcase — a milestone moment that drew attention from local media and art communities.
Then, just before the opening, the museum abruptly pulled the plug. The official excuse was “venue maintenance.”
The exhibition had been formally presented as a Taiwanese contemporary art exhibition, yet while citing repairs, the museum continued to host other events.
Local insiders discreetly confirmed what many suspected: The cancelation was the result of pressure from China.
The blow was devastating for the artists and curators’ team, who suddenly found their months of work erased by political maneuvering.
It shows that the comforting slogan “politics is politics, art is art” is, under the shadow of China’s interference, a fiction. Beijing treats art as politics by other means — and it would silence Taiwan whenever it can.
The incident shows that neither the participating artists and curators from Taiwan nor the local partners in Kazakhstan had anticipated what would unfold.
How should Taiwan respond? For too long, the nation’s cultural diplomacy has focused on safe and familiar partners. Taiwanese rarely ask how to manage risk, anticipate sabotage or script responses to pressure campaigns. This cancelation lays bare the need to change that. Rather than shrinking back, Taiwan must push harder, reach farther and take its art to places Beijing would prefer it to be invisible.
Yes, this was a setback — but a valuable one. By bringing Taiwan’s art into Kazakhstan’s public imagination, even briefly, Taiwan sparked curiosity in a region that has had little contact with it. The exhibition’s absence left a hole, but also an opening: people would now wonder what they were not allowed to see. Unfulfilled anticipation is powerful and cannot be erased.
The experience should compel Taiwan to rethink its cultural diplomacy strategy. The shift in Taiwan’s economic and geopolitical standing gives the nation that chance. In the early 1970s, the Chinese Communist Party cracked open its path into the international community through the unlikely medium of table tennis. Could Taiwan carve out a unique form of “Ping-Pong diplomacy” through art?
If so, this is about more than recognition. It is about claiming the right to tell Taiwan’s own stories — its art, culture and history — on the world stage. That is a struggle worth pursuing, even if sometimes the road begins with what looks like failure.
China can cancel a show. It can pressure museums, whisper threats and wave contracts away, but what it cannot cancel is Taiwan’s determination to tell its own story — and to fight for the right to be seen, heard and recognized on the world stage.
Sheng Bo-chen is an independent curator and art critic.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we
RSS