A US federal jury on Aug. 20 found US Navy sailor Wei Jinchao, also known as Patrick Wei, guilty of espionage for selling classified defense information to Chinese intelligence operatives for US$12,000. The case against the 25-year-old again highlights a troubling trend of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recruiting ethnic Chinese abroad.
Wei, who is facing a sentence of life in prison, was born in China and became a naturalized US citizen. While he was convicted on six counts related to espionage, he was not found guilty of naturalization fraud.
The vulnerability of Chinese abroad stems from familial and ancestral ties in China — bonds the CCP exploits through coercion, inducement and blackmail to pressure people into cooperating with Beijing. The same tactics are deployed against exiled dissidents.
The Hong Kong-based magazine The Insider reported that the Chinese Ministry of State Security often operates under the guise of civilian institutions, such as Xinhua news agency, the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, the China Association for International Friendly Contact and the China International Travel Service.
Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) became general secretary of the CCP, he has pushed for the globalization of China’s public security forces. Under the initiative, so-called overseas police outposts have been set up by public security bureaus in multiple countries, tasked with intimidating dissidents, collecting intelligence and suppressing opposition abroad.
Public records show that Taiwan is home to more than 360,000 Chinese spouses. The majority of them likely relocated to Taiwan because of love, as opposed to the notion depicted in Chinese espionage drama The Message (潛伏), in which CCP agents masquerade as married couples for the purpose of government-backed intelligence.
Yet a single rotten apple can spoil the barrel. How many Patrick Weis are quietly embedded in Taiwan?
Although people should not descend into paranoia over the issue, they should remain vigilant. After all, while some threats hide in the shadows, others pose as innocuous bystanders, waiting patiently for the right moment to strike.
Wei, who is to be sentenced on Dec. 1, faces a lifetime behind bars in the US, and yet in Taiwan, CCP spies are frequently met with little more than a slap on the wrist — a discrepancy that is troubling and disheartening.
Yu Kung is a business professional.
Translated by Lenna Veronica Sumiski
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS