The Cabinet reshuffle has raised eyebrows. Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) is staying, despite criticisms that he failed to introduce any meaningful reforms or provide professional support in the field. However, the problems in education go beyond structural issues and would remain no matter how many times the minister is replaced, unless those issues are addressed.
About a week ago, I received a comment on Facebook which said that during the summer vacation, a group of teenagers, aged 11 to 16, broke into a private swimming pool and damaged the facilities. The pool’s owner called the police, who questioned the teenagers. Police found that most of the youngsters came from single-parent households or families with inadequate childcare. The parents agreed to pay compensation for the damage, which the owner accepted.
Although mainstream media did not pay much attention to this issue, the incident showed that many children lack adequate family care and proper guidance from educational institutions. For one, there are not enough facilities for young people to engage in summer activities. Without appropriate arrangements and support, children might be susceptible to developing bad behavioral traits.
In July, the ministry formulated policies to provide sports equipment to schools and designated the seventh period in class as time for extracurricular activities, but these ultimately came to naught. The policy only allowed access to equipment and required school teachers to manage them. The mindset behind such a half-baked policy is the main reason why education and social welfare policies often end up “patching an irreparable net” that repeatedly leads to incomplete measures and constant attempts at compensation.
In Hong Kong, there are youth service centers open all day from Monday to Saturday. These centers are managed by social workers or educators, and are equipped with facilities such as pool tables, badminton courts, online games, board games and music classrooms. However, in Taiwan, while there are many canteens and community centers for older people, there is a significant lack of dedicated spaces for young people, especially for teenagers.
I run the Masai Community Collaborative Learning Center in Yilan County’s Suao Township (蘇澳). The center mainly provides after-school care for children and young people during winter and summer vacations. It also offers learning programs, and a series of interpersonal communication courses and activities. It costs about NT$5 million (US$163,239) per year to run the center, which is located within a public junior-high school district. If similar centers were set up near about 700 junior-high schools nationwide, the total annual cost would be about NT$3.5 billion. That would be a small fraction of the overall education budget of about NT$300 billion.
With the nation’s declining birthrate, the government should invest more resources into supporting young people, especially those from underprivileged families.
Teng Ming-hung is a director of the Masai Community Collaborative Learning Center.
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase