A group of academics on Tuesday held a news conference in Taipei to voice opposition to restarting the decommissioned Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County. On Saturday, voters would decide on a referendum proposed by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to bring the plant — the last of Taiwan’s nuclear facilities to be shuttered — back online.
At a rally on Saturday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that Taiwan cannot secure enough clean energy without nuclear power. At a debate three days earlier, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) cited a report by the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies that said Taiwan’s power grid lacks resilience and needs nuclear energy. The report, based on a war game simulation of a Chinese blockade, said that shutting down the reactor for environmental reasons “greatly increased Taiwan’s energy vulnerability.” Downplaying nuclear waste concerns, Huang said that deep borehole disposal technology is safe, practical and well-suited for Taiwan.
However, National Taiwan University geology professor Chen Wen-shan (陳文山) said the Ma-anshan plant is just 900m from a tectonic fault line and rests on a relatively young geological layer that could amplify seismic risk. While spent fuel rods could theoretically be stored underground, no site surveys have been performed. Taiwan’s constant crustal compression might even trap the rods underground, making retrieval impossible, he added.
National Chung Hsing University environmental engineering professor Tsuang Ben-jei (莊秉潔) said that if the Ma-anshan plant were restarted and damaged in a disaster, there was a 70 percent chance the surrounding area would become a permanent exclusion zone, which would be especially severe in Taiwan, where only one-third of its mountainous terrain is habitable.
Another risk is military conflict. A nuclear plant could become a target during a confrontation with China, or be damaged amid missile strikes even if not deliberately attacked. Russia has repeatedly hit Ukraine’s power grid, and there is little reason to believe China would refrain from similar tactics. That undermines Huang’s argument that a blockade would make Taiwan vulnerable without nuclear power. The presence of nuclear plants could create an even greater danger.
That is where renewable energy shows its strength: decentralization. Unlike a single nuclear facility, distributed energy systems are harder to disable in a single strike and more resilient to natural disasters. Taiwan already generates 14.3 gigawatts from solar power, a figure the government aims to expand. Early wind farm installations suggest that offshore and onshore wind could achieve comparable or greater capacity, if regulatory and local hurdles can be overcome.
Meanwhile, an onshore wave-energy pilot project at Yilan County’s Port of Suao could be scaled up if successful, while geothermal and waste-to-energy systems have passed initial tests. Used together, these renewable sources could provide energy redundancy across Taiwan’s grid, without the catastrophic risks posed by nuclear power or the environmental damage from spent fuel rods.
To secure the nation’s energy future, the government should accelerate investment in sustainable energy and grid modernization. A resilient and self-sufficient power system is not only vital to reducing reliance on imported fuels, but also to bolstering national security and protecting Taiwan’s globally important semiconductor industry.
Nuclear power is often framed as a shortcut to energy security. In reality, it trades one vulnerability for another: replacing import dependence with seismic risk, generating radioactive waste and creating potential wartime targets. By contrast, renewables offer a path to stability, safety and independence — and should be Taiwan’s priority.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS