Former CIA director and retired US Army general David Petraeus on Monday participated in a forum hosted by the Hudson Institute think tank, at which he discussed lessons Taiwan can learn from the Russian invasion of Ukraine. As a close observer of the Ukraine war, Petraeus pointed out the deep influence the war has had on global military strategy — specifically in the Asia-Pacific region.
China is closely watching developments in Ukraine and drawing lessons from them, so it is crucial that Taiwan take note of three battlefield lessons and prepare.
The first lesson is: Deterrence must not fail. The key factor driving the outbreak of the Ukraine war was the failure of deterrence. Ukraine was inadequately prepared before the war and the international community did not provide sufficient military support in time. This led Russian President Vladimir Putin to believe that he could quickly reach his strategic objective, prompting the invasion.
Taiwan must learn that deterrence is more than merely showcasing military abilities. It also involves demonstrating a clear determination to defend and firm international cooperation and support. Taiwan must establish a defense posture that conveys its resolve to resist, while deepening defense cooperation with allies, to ensure deterrence power is sufficient to prevent a potential invasion.
Second, Taiwan must accelerate the modernization of its military and the deployment of uncrewed systems. The Ukraine war has illustrated that conflicts will be dominated by the use of uncrewed systems. From reconnaissance and strikes to logistical support, autonomous and automated technologies will play a key role. Taiwan could learn from Ukraine’s innovations in this area — using drones for precise strikes on Russian armored vehicles, deploying uncrewed maritime systems to sink enemy ships and utilizing smart drones to target key infrastructure.
Taiwan should make large-scale investments in such systems and explore algorithm-driven autonomous defense technologies to prepare for potential conflicts.
Third, Taiwan must bolster overall societal resilience and wartime preparedness. Being an island nation, Taiwan would face significant obstacles in receiving timely and feasible external support in the event of a conflict. Determining how to effectively stockpile strategic materials, improve the protection of critical infrastructure and diversify energy sources are critical issues that it must face. Ukraine has successfully maintained the continuity of its defense efforts by improving infrastructure defenses, pre-positioning strategic resources and establishing a robust social logistics network. Taiwan should comprehensively improve its energy resilience, conduct extensive inventory of its underground defense facilities, and consider how to address the potential energy disruptions and material shortages that would arise during a cross-strait conflict.
Only by thoroughly understanding the experiences from the battlefield in Ukraine and swiftly putting the lessons into practice can Taiwan ensure stable self-defense in an increasingly complex security environment.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
RSS