President William Lai (賴清德) on Tuesday gave the second of a series of 10 talks that he plans to deliver across Taiwan. The talk came with few surprises, and not just because of the use of the usual platitudes of national unity.
Lai’s approach to both the opposition in Taiwan — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in China has been to hold out olive branches tinged with an implicit critique: a call for consensus, but also a caution that he will compromise only so far.
It was no coincidence that he mentioned the 1949 Battle of Guningtou (古寧頭) and the 1958 Taiwan Strait Crisis as exemplars of the idea that “united, we are stronger,” the shared effort of the armed forces and civilians, irrespective of ethnicity, to safeguard Taiwan proper and the outlying islands.
Guningtou was fought in Kinmen between the retreating forces of the KMT following its defeat in China by the CCP. The KMT forces successfully defended Kinmen, which had always been part of China, and held it while the main KMT forces retreated to Taiwan proper, which the Japanese had relinquished in 1945.
The Second Taiwan Strait Crisis was the successful defense of Kinmen and Matsu in 1958 following a sustained bombardment by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.
Lai’s evocation of these events was a reminder to the KMT of the origin story of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, and of who the real enemy is.
Neither was it a coincidence that he referenced Taiwanese democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水). Chiang was born in Yilan in 1890 during Qing Dynasty rule; he was only four years old when the Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan, never again to come under Chinese rule under international law.
In 1927, Chiang cofounded a pro-Taiwan political party during Japanese colonial rule: a courageous stand for Taiwanese sovereignty and for unity in the face of rule by an external, colonial power.
The party’s name is often rendered, in English, as the Taiwanese People’s Party (臺灣民眾黨). In Chinese, it is identical to the name that then-Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) chose when he established the TPP in 2019.
It was no coincidence, either, that Ko chose that name. He was very aware of the history, and had expressed admiration for Chiang and the hope that he could “inherit” Chiang’s unfinished work. Lai was reminding TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) of the political DNA buried in Ko’s concept of the party that he founded.
For anyone in the audience who had not picked up on these references, Lai went on to mention Taiwan’s 38 years under martial law, the 228 Incident of 1947 and the 1979 Formosa Incident, also known as the Kaohsiung Incident, all of which were visited upon Taiwanese by the KMT. He continued by referring to all the people who had fought against authoritarian rule and had sacrificed their lives fighting for democracy, implicitly referencing Chiang and the original TPP in their struggle against colonial Japan, and the Taiwanese in their struggle against the KMT party-state.
To achieve a true whole-of-society effort to deter CCP aggression, Lai would need not just the public, but the KMT and the TPP on board. He knows that is unlikely to happen, and this is why he has embarked on this series of talks. He cannot get the opposition on his side to help foster unity among its followers, so he is trying to recruit the opposition’s followers to help him rein in the opposition parties’ destructive behavior.
If he succeeds, that is where the real surprise will come.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS