Over the weekend, a confrontation in the Middle East escalated.
Iran and Israel, after years of indirect engagements, are openly attacking each other with drones, missiles and airstrikes because of Iran’s nuclear program, which is viewed by Israel as an existential threat and by the US as a serious challenge to regional stability.
The 2015 nuclear agreement, once hailed as a breakthrough, aimed to curb Iran’s uranium enrichment in exchange for lifting international sanctions.
However, in 2018, US President Donald Trump’s first administration withdrew the US from the deal, seeking a more restrictive framework on Iran’s nuclear ambitions and regional influence.
Israel, on the other hand, had opposed the original deal from the beginning, saying it gave Iran room to maneuver while legitimizing its nuclear infrastructure.
As diplomacy deadlocked and Iran’s program advanced, military escalation has become a central instrument for both sides. Eventually, on Sunday, US B-2s targeted underground nuclear facilities with bunker buster munitions deep inside Iran.
In response, the Iranian parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key artery through which one-third of global seaborne oil passes. That decision still awaits final approval from supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. If enforced, even a partial closure of the strait could trigger dramatic increases in global energy prices, disrupting everything from fuel markets to the broader cost of living.
What does this mean for those living on the other side of Asia and why are its implications serious?
Taiwan’s status as a high-tech hub comes with enormous energy demands and any shock to global energy markets threatens to ripple quickly through its economy.
The Strait of Hormuz might look remote on a map, but it is a vital artery in Taiwan’s energy lifeline. According to the Bureau of Energy, 61 percent of Taiwan’s imported crude oil comes from Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Qatar. Additionally, nearly one-third of its liquefied natural gas imports are sourced from Qatar alone.
Whether from a full blockade, surges in insurance costs or rerouted tankers, any disruption in these flows would not only affect fuel prices, but could hit Taiwan’s entire economic foundation.
That vulnerability has only deepened with the shutdown of Taiwan’s last nuclear reactor at the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant on May 17. Once a stable and domestically controlled source of low-emissions baseload power, nuclear energy now plays no part in Taiwan’s operating capacity.
Meanwhile, renewables have not filled the gap. The share of renewables sits at about 12 percent, well below the government’s 20 percent target for this year.
With nuclear gone and green energy lagging, fossil fuels have taken over, increasing Taiwan’s exposure to price volatility and geopolitical risks.
Energy is not just about electricity — it is about the basic functioning of society. It powers farms, factories, data centers and homes. In Taiwan’s case, it powers the world’s most advanced chip foundries, the backbone of global digital infrastructure. It keeps artificial intelligence server farms humming and assembly lines moving. If energy prices spike, so does the cost of production and the pressure on public budgets.
Even if Taiwan avoids direct supply cuts, the global rush to secure alternative fuel sources would drive up prices. For a government already navigating complex energy reforms, a surge in costs could delay renewable investment, deepen budget strains and intensify domestic dissatisfaction.
This is a clear warning that energy strategy must be grounded in reality, not just idealism. Taiwan’s reliance on imported fossil fuels, combined with the shutdown of its last nuclear reactor and a slow transition to renewables, leaves it vulnerable to external shocks beyond its control. The potential implications of a disruption in the Strait of Hormuz demonstrate how exposed Taiwan’s energy security is to global events.
In this light, energy policy cannot be treated as a symbolic political contest between clean-energy ambitions and nuclear skepticism. It must be approached with clear-eyed pragmatism. Taiwan needs a diversified energy portfolio, secure and long-term supply agreements, investments in grid flexibility and a serious, nonideological conversation about the future of nuclear energy. None of these solutions is perfect on its own, but together, they build resilience.
In a world in which energy routes can be blocked overnight and fuel prices can fluctuate wildly with global events, Taiwan’s economic stability and, naturally, its national security, depend on getting this right. Energy security is not just an environmental or economic goal. It is the foundation of everything else.
Harun Talha Ayanoglu is a research associate at the Taiwan Center for Security Studies.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI