Relationships in the AI age
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, an increasing number of young people are forming emotional connections with virtual AI chatbot companions. Some even refer to them as “AI boyfriends” or “AI girlfriends,” seeking comfort amid loneliness, stress or challenges in real-life relationships. These chatbots respond instantly, possess the ability to understand emotions, and can retain the context of previous conversations. As a result, users often feel “understood” and “accompanied,” giving rise to a new form of digital attachment culture.
However, such emotional reliance on AI is not without its risks. In a recent case in the US, a teenage boy who had engaged in long-term interactions with an AI chatbot began to show signs of detachment from reality. He started avoiding real-life social interactions and his academic performance declined. After receiving messages from the AI chatbot that allegedly encouraged him to “seek eternal peace,” he developed extreme thoughts that led to a tragic incident, his family said.
The case has sparked widespread concern over the potential mental health implications of emotional dependence on AI.
To mitigate the negative effects of AI-related emotional attachment, education and clear boundaries are essential. Society must enhance understanding of AI technologies — especially among adolescents — through school curricula, lectures and social media campaigns that promote healthy and informed use of AI chatbots.
It is crucial to emphasize that while AI could offer a sense of companionship, it remains a tool and cannot replace authentic human interaction. Families and schools should work together to help young people address loneliness or stress by encouraging diverse coping strategies, including real-life interpersonal communication.
In the face of the psychological challenges posed by emerging technologies, schools, parents and users should take proactive steps. This includes incorporating “digital emotional literacy” into education curricula, and improving access to mental health counseling and awareness programs — such as campaigns that promote “caring for yourself, caring for others.”
Whether in schools, workplaces, or homes, we must encourage everyone — especially students — to recognize changes in their emotional well-being, seek help when needed and maintain holistic health. By doing so, people can enjoy the convenience that AI brings, while safeguarding their emotional safety and fostering a healthy understanding of relationships and emotional connection.
Mei Syuan-sin
Kaohsiung
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report