Relationships in the AI age
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, an increasing number of young people are forming emotional connections with virtual AI chatbot companions. Some even refer to them as “AI boyfriends” or “AI girlfriends,” seeking comfort amid loneliness, stress or challenges in real-life relationships. These chatbots respond instantly, possess the ability to understand emotions, and can retain the context of previous conversations. As a result, users often feel “understood” and “accompanied,” giving rise to a new form of digital attachment culture.
However, such emotional reliance on AI is not without its risks. In a recent case in the US, a teenage boy who had engaged in long-term interactions with an AI chatbot began to show signs of detachment from reality. He started avoiding real-life social interactions and his academic performance declined. After receiving messages from the AI chatbot that allegedly encouraged him to “seek eternal peace,” he developed extreme thoughts that led to a tragic incident, his family said.
The case has sparked widespread concern over the potential mental health implications of emotional dependence on AI.
To mitigate the negative effects of AI-related emotional attachment, education and clear boundaries are essential. Society must enhance understanding of AI technologies — especially among adolescents — through school curricula, lectures and social media campaigns that promote healthy and informed use of AI chatbots.
It is crucial to emphasize that while AI could offer a sense of companionship, it remains a tool and cannot replace authentic human interaction. Families and schools should work together to help young people address loneliness or stress by encouraging diverse coping strategies, including real-life interpersonal communication.
In the face of the psychological challenges posed by emerging technologies, schools, parents and users should take proactive steps. This includes incorporating “digital emotional literacy” into education curricula, and improving access to mental health counseling and awareness programs — such as campaigns that promote “caring for yourself, caring for others.”
Whether in schools, workplaces, or homes, we must encourage everyone — especially students — to recognize changes in their emotional well-being, seek help when needed and maintain holistic health. By doing so, people can enjoy the convenience that AI brings, while safeguarding their emotional safety and fostering a healthy understanding of relationships and emotional connection.
Mei Syuan-sin
Kaohsiung
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the