In her widely publicized Harvard graduation speech, Jiang Yurong (蔣雨融) spoke of a shrinking world, common interests and a shared sense of humanity. She called for compassion and solidarity. However, what does Jiang know — or care — about the Uighurs in this “small world,” especially those suffering within her own country?
Has she ever spoken out about the more than 3 million Uighurs detained in Chinese concentration camps? Has she shown any empathy toward their fate or used her platform to call for justice? Did she only discover her “humanity” when US President Donald Trump’s administration imposed visa restrictions on Chinese students?
The influence and credibility of a humanitarian are not measured by eloquent speeches alone. They are tested by the ability to recognize and respond to human suffering, especially when it is politically inconvenient. Otherwise, such speeches are not just hollow, they are a calculated form of deception. The larger the stage, the louder the applause, the more dangerous the lie.
Jiang said that “if there is a woman anywhere in the world who can’t afford a menstrual pad, that makes me even poorer.”
A compelling sentiment, but what about the mothers in the Xinjiang Police Files — women who were not searching for pads, but for their missing children? Patiguli Ghulam searched for her son for five years, then was imprisoned simply for asking questions. Does Jiang’s humanity extend to her?
“If a child dies in a war they didn’t start or understand, a part of me dies with them,” Jiang said.
Where was this sorrow when China’s policies — including forced sterilization and family separation — contributed to the disappearance of more than 1 million Uighurs, as the birthrate fell by almost half from 2017 to 2019?
Jiang has not once acknowledged these atrocities — not officially, not on social media, not through any student or university platform.
Jiang, like hundreds of thousands of Chinese students in the US, made it abroad by passing the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) ideological and political loyalty tests. Such students benefit from a regime that rolled tanks over its own citizens in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and launched genocide against Uighurs in East Turkestan (known in China as Xinjiang) in 2017.
Despite being highly educated, these students remained silent during global catastrophes with clear links to the CCP. When COVID-19 spread worldwide and killed more than 1 million in the US alone, not a word of accountability was directed at the Chinese regime. Likewise, during eight years of Uighur genocide, there has been silence — strategic, complicit silence.
Since the 2000s, more than 1 million Chinese students have studied in the US. They absorbed the US’ technological prowess, but not its values of justice, equality and democracy. When they returned to China, they helped develop cutting-edge technologies used to run surveillance states and ethnic repression. Instead of bringing democratic reform, their foreign education became a tool for the CCP to entrench its power.
The Uighur genocide happened because China became stronger, technologically and economically, partly by students trained in US institutions. Facial recognition systems, predictive policing algorithms, data surveillance — many of these tools used against Uighurs have roots in Western research.
It is time the US reckons with the consequences of educating handpicked emissaries of authoritarian regimes. The Uighur genocide is a moral warning. The cost of naivety has already been enormous. So no, we should no longer be swayed by flowery speeches from figures such as Jiang. Trump’s decision to restrict Chinese student visas was not just political — it was moral, intellectual and strategic.
Kok Bayraq is a Uighur-American observer.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has