Kindness under pressure
A few months ago, I saw an old woman lying in an alley near my school. A girl passing by immediately went up to check on her, followed by myself and several others. We stayed with her until she was able to stand up. Fortunately, she was not seriously injured.
I was initially hesitant. The thought flashed through my mind that if I could not help, I might end up causing more trouble, for that person or for myself. At the same time, I knew that if I did not lend a hand, I would feel guilty.
Taiwanese are mostly kind. This kindness not only exists in interpersonal interactions in real life, but also extends to the online world. People use social media to help find missing people, initiate online fundraising, forward emergency relief information or write articles to call on more people to pay attention to vulnerable groups.
However, these good intentions seem to be facing a test. I have seen some cases in the media recently where people who helped out with good intentions got into trouble because their actions were misunderstood, such as being mistaken for sexual harassers, being held accountable during the rescue process or the amplification effect of social media, which made people afraid that their actions would be judged online or that the way they were handled was wrong. Increasingly, people choose to stand by and watch rather than get involved.
The reasons include insufficient legal protections, endless scams, declining social trust and the rapid exaggeration of controversial events by the media and social media platforms, making the simple act of helping others full of risk and unpredictability.
A friend told me that one day, she and her family were driving when they came across a single-vehicle accident. They got out of the car and asked the other party if they needed help. He said he was fine and left. A few days later, her family received a call from the police, saying that the other party had accused them of a hit-and-run. The surveillance footage was incomplete and the case was eventually brought to court. This incident made her start to wonder whether she should avoid helping others out of goodwill.
If the law lacks a clear protection mechanism, then even help with good intentions could cause people to fall into legal disputes due to misunderstandings or simply insufficient evidence.
This is not to say that I think Taiwanese have become indifferent to the plight of others. However, we need a safer social environment that can support goodwill. Perhaps we should re-examine the current laws to see if they can fully protect those who lend a hand with good intentions; the media and social media platforms should also report events more carefully and responsibly to avoid causing harm and misunderstanding.
“Helping others” should not be a risk or a burden, but a social value that deserves to be encouraged and cherished.
The next time someone needs help, we all hope that there will still be someone brave enough to step forward and that society would choose to support them.
Lee Tz-hua
Kaohsiung
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS