Kindness under pressure
A few months ago, I saw an old woman lying in an alley near my school. A girl passing by immediately went up to check on her, followed by myself and several others. We stayed with her until she was able to stand up. Fortunately, she was not seriously injured.
I was initially hesitant. The thought flashed through my mind that if I could not help, I might end up causing more trouble, for that person or for myself. At the same time, I knew that if I did not lend a hand, I would feel guilty.
Taiwanese are mostly kind. This kindness not only exists in interpersonal interactions in real life, but also extends to the online world. People use social media to help find missing people, initiate online fundraising, forward emergency relief information or write articles to call on more people to pay attention to vulnerable groups.
However, these good intentions seem to be facing a test. I have seen some cases in the media recently where people who helped out with good intentions got into trouble because their actions were misunderstood, such as being mistaken for sexual harassers, being held accountable during the rescue process or the amplification effect of social media, which made people afraid that their actions would be judged online or that the way they were handled was wrong. Increasingly, people choose to stand by and watch rather than get involved.
The reasons include insufficient legal protections, endless scams, declining social trust and the rapid exaggeration of controversial events by the media and social media platforms, making the simple act of helping others full of risk and unpredictability.
A friend told me that one day, she and her family were driving when they came across a single-vehicle accident. They got out of the car and asked the other party if they needed help. He said he was fine and left. A few days later, her family received a call from the police, saying that the other party had accused them of a hit-and-run. The surveillance footage was incomplete and the case was eventually brought to court. This incident made her start to wonder whether she should avoid helping others out of goodwill.
If the law lacks a clear protection mechanism, then even help with good intentions could cause people to fall into legal disputes due to misunderstandings or simply insufficient evidence.
This is not to say that I think Taiwanese have become indifferent to the plight of others. However, we need a safer social environment that can support goodwill. Perhaps we should re-examine the current laws to see if they can fully protect those who lend a hand with good intentions; the media and social media platforms should also report events more carefully and responsibly to avoid causing harm and misunderstanding.
“Helping others” should not be a risk or a burden, but a social value that deserves to be encouraged and cherished.
The next time someone needs help, we all hope that there will still be someone brave enough to step forward and that society would choose to support them.
Lee Tz-hua
Kaohsiung
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS