With bitcoin reaching a new record, it shows more investors are getting swept up in the dream of “being their own bank” via tokens that can be transferred instantly and anonymously outside the traditional financial system. Yet at the same time, there seems to be too little awareness of the cost of being your own bank security guard in a cashless world.
A recent double-digit rise in crypto-exchange hacks and a wave of brazen crypto-executive kidnapping attempts — with the latest taking place in broad daylight on the streets of Paris — has put the industry on edge and ramped up interest in security, with 23 such attacks recorded this year by one database (up from six over the same period last year), Bloomberg News said. They have resulted in grisly mutilations, such as severed fingers, and have pressured the French government to do more to stop them, even if statistically, France scores relatively well on crimes such as homicide.
This goes way beyond one country; crime is changing everywhere. Banks are no longer easy or juicy targets for robbers, with heists down more than 80 percent since the 1990s, as branches close and piles of cash hoarded in safes become a rarity. We are also all carrying less cash in a payments world driven by taps and swipes. Personal safety was one reason put forward by ABBA’s Bjorn Ulvaeus a decade ago for making Sweden a cashless economy.
Meanwhile, other forms of criminality have become more prevalent as technological and social upheaval sees bandits adapt. The spread of digital wallets on platforms such as Coinbase Global Inc is attracting hackers, most recently to obtain client data.
Exchange hacks rose 17 percent last year, compliance firm TRM said. High-value muggings such as watch theft have become more lucrative, with the total value of lost and stolen timepieces in the UK now at ￡1.6 billion (US$2.17 billion), Watch Register said. Home-jackings are also on the rise; celebrity Kim Kardashian was robbed at gunpoint in a Paris hotel in 2016.
The rise of physical attacks on crypto holders and their families is the grimly logical next step, a symbolic return to the pre-banking days of highway robber Dick Turpin. The downside of high capital mobility is high physical vulnerability: Extorting crypto face-to-face is known as a “wrench attack,” because of its simplicity, brutality and potential high return. One social media slip-up can reveal your whereabouts to criminals, who themselves are also becoming more tech-savvy and able to organize a heist through digital channels.
Deterrence is going to be key in tackling this kind of crime, and it is heartening that police are doing a good job tracking down gangs and seizing ransom payments. What is less encouraging in France is prison overcrowding and its knock-on impact on sentencing.
Yet the debate about how to balance security and liberty is also brushing up against crypto’s libertarian ethos. Some industry entrepreneurs think the best way to avoid being targeted is more anonymity — and the right to bear arms, which is tightly regulated in France.
Without sounding too squeamish and European, I am not convinced.
“Carrying a weapon is a serious step requiring serious training,” said Bruno Pomart, a former member of elite police unit RAID. “Nor does it solve the problem of vulnerable family members based elsewhere.”
The more likely outcome would be demand for private security firms and better protection.
Security specialist Topaz Group CEO Salvatore Furnari said he is increasingly in touch with crypto-industry figures and advising them on a top-to-bottom rethink of how to protect themselves and their associates.
“The crypto world is going through the same things banks used to,” he said.
However, this all comes at a cost — and it might be that some types of investors decide that owning crypto is not worth it.
One tech executive said he simply sold his portfolio for peace of mind.
Regulators might also eventually decide that crypto needs to be more centralized, not less, to help combat crime.
After Italy was hit with a wave of shocking abductions during the “years of lead,” the government eventually moved to dissuade extortion by freezing victims’ financial assets and those of their families.
This would be clearly anathema to crypto owners. However, if we are all going to end up being our own bank, it might be another type of alarm to consider.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS