Taiwan was not invited to the annual World Health Assembly (WHA) — the decisionmaking body of the WHO — for the ninth consecutive year, and a proposal by allies to invite the nation was rejected on Monday last week due to China’s objection.
Taiwan has been trying to join the WHO since 1997, and it only attended WHA sessions as an observer from 2009 to 2016 with the designation of “Chinese Taipei,” during the administration of then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), who signed several controversial agreements with China. Relations between Beijing and Taipei were warmer at the time.
However, since former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took office in 2016, China has taken a hard-line approach in poaching Taiwan’s diplomatic allies and blocking the nation’s international participation.
Following consistent practices from previous years, the government this year sent a WHA action team led by health officials to Geneva, Switzerland, to half protest the WHO Secretariat, half campaign for international support. Efforts to increase the nation’s international recognition and visibility also included diplomats, civic groups and overseas Taiwanese holding events on the sidelines of the assembly.
On Monday last week, the WHA’s first day, the representative offices in Taiwan of eight nations — Australia, Canada, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Japan, Lithuania and the UK — issued a joint statement to reiterate their support for Taiwan’s meaningful engagement with the WHO and participation as an observer at the WHA.
At the assembly, 11 of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies and 15 like-minded countries directly or indirectly voiced support for the nation’s participation.
Belize and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines represented allies and proposed to include Taiwan in this year’s WHA, arguing that China’s interpretation of UN Resolution 2758 and WHA Resolution 25.1 are being misused, as they do not mention Taiwan, and “do not justify the exclusion of Taiwan, nor do they grant China the right to represent the Taiwanese people,” but the proposal was rejected.
Representatives of Germany, France, Japan and New Zealand, as well as allies Haiti and the Marshall Islands, voiced their backing for Taiwan’s participation during their opening remarks. The WHA action team attended more than 40 bilateral meetings, forums and news conferences, and Taiwanese civic groups held exhibitions, forums and rallies in Geneva to demonstrate the nation’s healthcare achievements and determination to contribute to global health.
Under China’s intensifying pressure on Taiwan, the WHA bid has always been a difficult challenge for the nation, but the government has not given up throughout the years.
The persistent efforts by the government and civic groups have over the past few years led to more countries and medical organizations voicing support for Taiwan’s international participation, with some even challenging China’s misuse of UN Resolution 2758.
However, the US’ withdrawal from the WHO, effective from January next year, and its call to create a global health cooperation network outside the WHO, might present new challenges for Taiwan.
Members of civic groups have expressed different opinions, with some seeing the US’ withdrawal as a positive opportunity for the WHO to reorganize, while some speculate that China might step in to fill the gap and make it even more difficult for Taiwan to join.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Saturday said Taiwan would continue its efforts to join the WHO, despite facing various challenges and the US’ withdrawal. With the impacts unclear, the government should keep a closer eye on the changes in the coming months, as it might need to readjust and prepare new strategies for next year’s WHA bid.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS