In Taiwan, especially in cities such as Taipei, soaring housing prices have placed the dream of owning a home out of reach for young people. Once considered a major milestone in adulthood, it has become an unattainable goal for many.
Stagnant wages coupled with soaring property prices are at the heart of the problem. The average monthly salary for people in their 20s and 30s is NT$35,000 to NT$45,000 (US$1,159 to US$1,490), government data showed. Some earn even less. By comparison, the average price of an apartment in Taipei is more than NT$10 million.
To prepare for a 20 percent down payment, a young person would have to save nearly all of their income for more than a decade — and that does not account for rent, daily expenses or inflation. Not surprisingly, many young people still live with their parents — not out of convenience, but out of necessity.
As a college student about to graduate and enter the workforce, I am leaning toward living with my parents — not because I want to, but because I have to. The cost of renting a small apartment is too high with entry-level wages. For many, staying at home has become a financial survival strategy rather than a lifestyle choice.
Homeownership, once seen as a natural step toward independence and family life, is an elusive dream. The traditional life path — graduate, work, get married, buy a home, raise a family — no longer fits today’s economic realities. Many young people delay marriage or choose not to have children, because they fear they cannot afford it. Others are giving up on homeownership altogether.
However, housing issues are more than just financial. They also have emotional and psychological effects. More young people say they feel helpless and disillusioned. Despite working long hours and saving diligently, they still find themselves unable to afford a home. That undermines their sense of fairness and belief in social mobility.
Even people in their 40s and 50s, including married couples with children, are often unable to afford a home. For many people, renting has become the norm rather than a transitionary phase.
To that end, the government has implemented schemes such as youth housing loans and rental subsidies. While such measures have slightly eased the burden of renting, they have largely failed to address the underlying problem: the widening gap between house prices and incomes. Critics say the core problem lies in the insufficient regulation of property speculation and an overreliance on real estate as an investment asset.
The problem is compounded by generational misunderstanding. Older people, who were able to afford homes when prices were much lower, sometimes accuse younger people of being unwilling to “suffer” or make sacrifices. That is not the case. The economic landscape has changed fundamentally. Hard work alone no longer guarantees upward mobility. The ratio of wages to house prices is getting worse every year.
Taiwan’s housing crisis is not only an economic problem, but also a social problem. It raises questions about fairness, opportunity and the long-term sustainability of society. Without bold and systemic reforms, Taiwan risks alienating its young population and deepening the wealth gap. Most of the young people around me who have entered the workforce still live with their parents to save on rent.
Solving the housing crisis requires more than just building more homes. It calls for a reassessment of housing itself — not as a speculative commodity, but as a fundamental human right. If Taiwan truly values its younger generations, then owning a home should not be a luxury for a wealthy few, but a realistic goal for all.
Huang Yu-chien is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS