In response to US President Donald Trump’s tariffs, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus on Tuesday proposed a bill that includes a provision to distribute cash handouts of NT$10,000 to each Taiwanese national before the end of October. However, at this stage, this is not an appropriate solution. The impact of the US’ tariffs cannot be resolved with a simple cash handout, and the recent appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar makes such a measure even less reasonable.
The US tariff hikes against Taiwan have significantly raised costs for exporters. However, if a product is competitive enough, those costs could be passed on to US consumers — in cases such as these, the real impact on exporters stems from reduced demand caused by a decrease in US consumer purchasing power.
If a product is replaceable, the short-term impact would be severe and the government should swiftly intervene by leading firms to explore other export markets or undergo transformations. The government’s role is not to provide universal subsidies to all firms, but to support and guide those that are most affected.
The appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar is the most basic economic principle in addressing the Taiwan-US trade imbalance. As various sectors anticipate appreciation, hot money flows in, possibly from overseas or Taiwanese investors. When appreciation occurs, import costs decrease and importers immediately benefit, making subsidies unnecessary. Taiwanese consumers would also enjoy falling prices, slowed inflation and a decrease in the cost of overseas travel — all benefits which would boost consumer spending. Issuing cash handouts would then serve no clear purpose — that is, other than to attempt to avoid the political fallout of a recall.
Trump’s tariffs could lead to a global economic recession, a risk that requires advanced preparation — but not in the form of immediate universal cash handouts. The NT dollar has already appreciated. If combined with nationwide cash handouts and excessive spending, this could result in an influx of hot money. Taiwan would risk experiencing an asset bubble, similar to Japan’s in the late 1980s, which severely damaged its economy.
The most pressing task is to prevent the NT dollar’s appreciation from causing excess consumer spending due to hot money inflows. It is also urgent to prevent a surge in the money supply brought on by the money multiplier effect.
It is worth noting that despite holding a majority in the previous legislature, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) never used its numbers to force through votes or crush all dissent. Most bills were passed after holding cross-party discussions and coming to the broadest possible consensus.
However, this legislative session is in stark contrast, having been completely dominated by the alliance between the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). Together, they hold just one more legislative seat than the DPP caucus, yet the sheer level of their arrogance suggests that they think they are a majority party. Rather than seeking a consensus before passing bills, they often resort to forced voting, intensifying partisan conflict, and worsening the quality of legislation and budget proposals.
If the KMT forces the vote again to pass this bill, distributing NT$10,000 in cash to all Taiwanese would not benefit the nation’s economic development. Universal cash handouts must be timed appropriately. If the global economy were stagnating, such a measure would be much-needed relief. However, if there are already concerns over inflows of hot money, handing out cash could instead fuel a bubble economy.
This would be anything but a blessing for the country, and would sow the seeds of future accountability. Surely, the blue and white parties would not once again shirk their responsibility when the time comes.
Wang Chih-chien is a distinguished professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”
RSS