Growing up to uncertainty
When I stepped into the university job fair, I felt a mix of excitement and unease. The future is a blur. The COVID-19 pandemic, wars, economic crises and technological revolutions have shaped the world we live in; the idea of “becoming an adult” is intimidating and often overwhelming.
Over the past few years, many young people have lived under a constant cloud of uncertainty. The pandemic changed how we study and work, making remote learning and working the new normal, leaving many of us feeling disconnected.
Then came the war in Ukraine, rising inflation and energy shortages — everyday expenses kept climbing and so did our worries about financial security. Meanwhile, the rapid rise of artificial intelligence made the future of many traditional jobs increasingly unclear. Would what I have studied still be relevant a few years from now? Would my career be replaced by automation?
In Taiwan, many college graduates still earn about NT$30,000 a month, painfully inadequate compared with skyrocketing living and housing costs. The dream of financial independence, of moving out of our parents’ homes or buying an apartment, feels out of reach.
Some classmates are preparing for civil service exams in search of stability; others plan to study abroad or look for better opportunities overseas. With growing tensions across the Taiwan Strait and instability around the globe, the future seems filled with even more uncertainties. How can we find our place in a world that feels like it is constantly shifting?
Growing up in this era means that becoming an adult is not just about landing a stable job or starting a family — it is about having the courage to move forward even when anxious and unsure. We might not be able to control the future, but we can shape it little by little with each choice we make.
He Guo-zhen
Kaohsiung
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India