The recall campaign targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi was long considered a mission impossible. Just weeks before the petition deadline, organizers discovered that the format they had used was incorrect. Undeterred, they transformed their anxiety into motivation, mobilizing friends and neighbors to resubmit their signatures using the correct format.
In less than two weeks, the number of valid signatures surged from 17,000 to 32,777 — exceeding the required threshold by 69.06 percent. The campaign not only cleared the requirement, but also surpassed the total collected in the recall effort against KMT Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯), becoming the largest recall petition in the country.
However, the Hualien County Election Commission was suspected of creating difficulties for the petitioners. Hundreds of residents gathered to voice their concerns. The signature count took nearly 14 hours to complete, with only 11 signatures deemed invalid.
Widely known as the “King of Hualien,” Fu has been an oligarchic figure in the county’s political landscape for more than two decades. Many times he met with high-ranking Chinese officials over the past year, and has been leading efforts by the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party to obstruct legislative procedures and challenge the Constitution.
In response to what many view as a deeply concerning political influence, the collection of 32,777 signatures has reinvigorated recall efforts nationwide. The successful petition drive has become a rallying point, boosting morale as the campaign enters its third stage.
I participated in the first-stage petition as a volunteer and witnessed campaigners standing on street corners, holding placards and inviting passersby to sign. One by one, citizens signed their names with care and determination — a quiet but powerful act of civic engagement.
As the campaign gained momentum, signature collection stations were set up across the area, eventually leading to the establishment of a headquarters in Jian Township (吉安). The volunteer team grew to more than 100 people.
To avoid being recognized and visited by local government workers, many wore hats and masks. Over time, their confidence grew, and they began chanting slogans such as “Recall Fu Kun-chi” in public spaces.
Their story is a reminder that entrenched political power can be challenged when ordinary people stand against it. The petition drive in Hualien demonstrates that democracy not only has a check and balance mechanism serving to correct its errors, but also sends a clear message to elected officials: They are civil servants, not superior overlords.
As the public has shown a strong will to recall Fu, his influence in Hualien has been weakened.
A tax rebate dispute between Lucky Cement Corp and the Hualien County Government has drawn national attention, further highlighting concerns over governance there.
Taiwan is a democratic country that upholds the rule of law. Yet under Fu’s tenure as Hualien County commissioner, the region often appeared to operate outside those norms. When even a major enterprise struggles to be treated fairly, one can only imagine the political pressure faced by small and medium-sized enterprises or ordinary citizens.
While the KMT has traditionally held more support than the Democratic Progressive Party in Hualien, the recall petition’s signature count speaks to its broad legitimacy.
To bring Taiwan and Hualien back onto the right track, voters should use their votes in the third phase to bring an end to the Fu dynasty.
Hong Tsun-ming is a policy specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Fion Khan
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something