The recall campaign targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi was long considered a mission impossible. Just weeks before the petition deadline, organizers discovered that the format they had used was incorrect. Undeterred, they transformed their anxiety into motivation, mobilizing friends and neighbors to resubmit their signatures using the correct format.
In less than two weeks, the number of valid signatures surged from 17,000 to 32,777 — exceeding the required threshold by 69.06 percent. The campaign not only cleared the requirement, but also surpassed the total collected in the recall effort against KMT Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯), becoming the largest recall petition in the country.
However, the Hualien County Election Commission was suspected of creating difficulties for the petitioners. Hundreds of residents gathered to voice their concerns. The signature count took nearly 14 hours to complete, with only 11 signatures deemed invalid.
Widely known as the “King of Hualien,” Fu has been an oligarchic figure in the county’s political landscape for more than two decades. Many times he met with high-ranking Chinese officials over the past year, and has been leading efforts by the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party to obstruct legislative procedures and challenge the Constitution.
In response to what many view as a deeply concerning political influence, the collection of 32,777 signatures has reinvigorated recall efforts nationwide. The successful petition drive has become a rallying point, boosting morale as the campaign enters its third stage.
I participated in the first-stage petition as a volunteer and witnessed campaigners standing on street corners, holding placards and inviting passersby to sign. One by one, citizens signed their names with care and determination — a quiet but powerful act of civic engagement.
As the campaign gained momentum, signature collection stations were set up across the area, eventually leading to the establishment of a headquarters in Jian Township (吉安). The volunteer team grew to more than 100 people.
To avoid being recognized and visited by local government workers, many wore hats and masks. Over time, their confidence grew, and they began chanting slogans such as “Recall Fu Kun-chi” in public spaces.
Their story is a reminder that entrenched political power can be challenged when ordinary people stand against it. The petition drive in Hualien demonstrates that democracy not only has a check and balance mechanism serving to correct its errors, but also sends a clear message to elected officials: They are civil servants, not superior overlords.
As the public has shown a strong will to recall Fu, his influence in Hualien has been weakened.
A tax rebate dispute between Lucky Cement Corp and the Hualien County Government has drawn national attention, further highlighting concerns over governance there.
Taiwan is a democratic country that upholds the rule of law. Yet under Fu’s tenure as Hualien County commissioner, the region often appeared to operate outside those norms. When even a major enterprise struggles to be treated fairly, one can only imagine the political pressure faced by small and medium-sized enterprises or ordinary citizens.
While the KMT has traditionally held more support than the Democratic Progressive Party in Hualien, the recall petition’s signature count speaks to its broad legitimacy.
To bring Taiwan and Hualien back onto the right track, voters should use their votes in the third phase to bring an end to the Fu dynasty.
Hong Tsun-ming is a policy specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Fion Khan
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS