Recalls test civility
A lot has happened in Taiwan’s politics recently.
As a university student, I have realized that more young people are willing to fight for their country — more people care about politics right now. Is that a good or bad thing? I cannot say for sure, but on the surface, it shows that democracy is working.
The ongoing recall campaigns of legislators are a demonstration of that democracy. However, looking closer, things might not be that simple.
I have grown worried over the past few days as the recalls become more about fighting between political groups than about real accountability. Some leaders have been targeted not because they broke the nation’s laws, but because they are trying to do things for their own benefit instead of for the country.
The rules for initiating a recall in Taiwan are not strict, making it easy for organized groups to begin a campaign. Once it starts, it sets off a bomb — on social media, in newspapers, on markets and among party haters. It becomes daily news. As a result, legislators fight to keep their jobs instead of striving to make the best decisions.
In the past few days, it seems like people are talking less about facts or the best choices for Taiwan, and more about outrage.
Although recalls are part of Taiwan’s democratic system, people need to think carefully before initiating them. Are they asking for fairness, or are they just reacting out of anger? Are they helping society move forward, or just creating more division?
Taiwan’s democracy is strong, but it is still growing. We should protect it not only with laws, but also with better habits — as well as open minds and honest debate. If we want our democracy to last, we need to do more than just vote. We also need the wisdom to exercise that power well.
Hopefully the recall controversies will end soon, and that the result would make people believe in Taiwan — not in fighting in their own country.
Stacy CY Lin
Kaohsiung
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS