Recalls test civility
A lot has happened in Taiwan’s politics recently.
As a university student, I have realized that more young people are willing to fight for their country — more people care about politics right now. Is that a good or bad thing? I cannot say for sure, but on the surface, it shows that democracy is working.
The ongoing recall campaigns of legislators are a demonstration of that democracy. However, looking closer, things might not be that simple.
I have grown worried over the past few days as the recalls become more about fighting between political groups than about real accountability. Some leaders have been targeted not because they broke the nation’s laws, but because they are trying to do things for their own benefit instead of for the country.
The rules for initiating a recall in Taiwan are not strict, making it easy for organized groups to begin a campaign. Once it starts, it sets off a bomb — on social media, in newspapers, on markets and among party haters. It becomes daily news. As a result, legislators fight to keep their jobs instead of striving to make the best decisions.
In the past few days, it seems like people are talking less about facts or the best choices for Taiwan, and more about outrage.
Although recalls are part of Taiwan’s democratic system, people need to think carefully before initiating them. Are they asking for fairness, or are they just reacting out of anger? Are they helping society move forward, or just creating more division?
Taiwan’s democracy is strong, but it is still growing. We should protect it not only with laws, but also with better habits — as well as open minds and honest debate. If we want our democracy to last, we need to do more than just vote. We also need the wisdom to exercise that power well.
Hopefully the recall controversies will end soon, and that the result would make people believe in Taiwan — not in fighting in their own country.
Stacy CY Lin
Kaohsiung
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
RSS