Recalls test civility
A lot has happened in Taiwan’s politics recently.
As a university student, I have realized that more young people are willing to fight for their country — more people care about politics right now. Is that a good or bad thing? I cannot say for sure, but on the surface, it shows that democracy is working.
The ongoing recall campaigns of legislators are a demonstration of that democracy. However, looking closer, things might not be that simple.
I have grown worried over the past few days as the recalls become more about fighting between political groups than about real accountability. Some leaders have been targeted not because they broke the nation’s laws, but because they are trying to do things for their own benefit instead of for the country.
The rules for initiating a recall in Taiwan are not strict, making it easy for organized groups to begin a campaign. Once it starts, it sets off a bomb — on social media, in newspapers, on markets and among party haters. It becomes daily news. As a result, legislators fight to keep their jobs instead of striving to make the best decisions.
In the past few days, it seems like people are talking less about facts or the best choices for Taiwan, and more about outrage.
Although recalls are part of Taiwan’s democratic system, people need to think carefully before initiating them. Are they asking for fairness, or are they just reacting out of anger? Are they helping society move forward, or just creating more division?
Taiwan’s democracy is strong, but it is still growing. We should protect it not only with laws, but also with better habits — as well as open minds and honest debate. If we want our democracy to last, we need to do more than just vote. We also need the wisdom to exercise that power well.
Hopefully the recall controversies will end soon, and that the result would make people believe in Taiwan — not in fighting in their own country.
Stacy CY Lin
Kaohsiung
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS