Recalls test civility
A lot has happened in Taiwan’s politics recently.
As a university student, I have realized that more young people are willing to fight for their country — more people care about politics right now. Is that a good or bad thing? I cannot say for sure, but on the surface, it shows that democracy is working.
The ongoing recall campaigns of legislators are a demonstration of that democracy. However, looking closer, things might not be that simple.
I have grown worried over the past few days as the recalls become more about fighting between political groups than about real accountability. Some leaders have been targeted not because they broke the nation’s laws, but because they are trying to do things for their own benefit instead of for the country.
The rules for initiating a recall in Taiwan are not strict, making it easy for organized groups to begin a campaign. Once it starts, it sets off a bomb — on social media, in newspapers, on markets and among party haters. It becomes daily news. As a result, legislators fight to keep their jobs instead of striving to make the best decisions.
In the past few days, it seems like people are talking less about facts or the best choices for Taiwan, and more about outrage.
Although recalls are part of Taiwan’s democratic system, people need to think carefully before initiating them. Are they asking for fairness, or are they just reacting out of anger? Are they helping society move forward, or just creating more division?
Taiwan’s democracy is strong, but it is still growing. We should protect it not only with laws, but also with better habits — as well as open minds and honest debate. If we want our democracy to last, we need to do more than just vote. We also need the wisdom to exercise that power well.
Hopefully the recall controversies will end soon, and that the result would make people believe in Taiwan — not in fighting in their own country.
Stacy CY Lin
Kaohsiung
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
The political order of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) first took shape in 1988. Then-vice president Lee succeeded former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) after he passed, and served out the remainder of his term in office. In 1990, Lee was elected president by the National Assembly, and in 1996, he won Taiwan’s first direct presidential election. Those two, six and four-year terms were an era-defining 12-year presidential tenure. Throughout those years, Lee served as helmsman for Taiwan’s transition from martial law and authoritarianism to democracy. This period came to be known as the “quiet revolution,” leaving a legacy containing light
Gulf states did not ask the US to go to war with Iran, but many are now urging it not to stop short by leaving the Islamic Republic still able to threaten the Gulf’s oil lifeline and the economies that depend on it, three Gulf sources said. At the same time, these sources, and five Western and Arab diplomats said Washington was pressing Gulf states to join the US-Israeli war. According to three of them, US President Donald Trump wants to show regional backing for the campaign to bolster its international legitimacy as well as support at home. “There is a wide
RSS