Taiwanese society appears normal on the surface, but is deeply distorted beneath. From politics and education to the media and public sector, many systems and values have strayed far from their original purpose — yet they are still accepted as part of everyday life.
I have come to care about these issues not just as a student of international affairs, but as someone shaped by personal observation and reflection. My father is a police officer, a profession often seen as stable, respectable and even admirable. However, I never spoke with him directly about the details of his work, but his silence only deepened my curiosity.
Growing up, I witnessed the constant stress and fatigue he carried home, and I began to wonder: What exactly causes this kind of pressure?
Much of what I have come to understand comes from older mentors and acquaintances — people with firsthand knowledge of Taiwan’s justice system, law enforcement and political machinery. Their stories helped me see that the exhaustion I witnessed was systemic.
One of the most persistent issues I have come to recognize is the enduring presence of organized crime. Politicians form symbiotic relationships with gangs to secure votes and consolidate power, while law enforcement often turns a blind eye.
Over time, “not getting involved” becomes an unspoken rule. This moral compromise, replicated across institutions, has allowed corruption to blend seamlessly into the structure of everyday governance.
I used to believe that if you worked hard and did the right thing, society would reward you. However, seeing my father — a man of principle — slowly worn down by a system that offers no real justice or support, I began to understand that what truly erodes faith is the institutions that enable bad actors.
My political views have also been shaped by discussions with my peers at university and engagement with independent media, and I have come to see that many young Taiwanese feel disillusioned.
Faced with high housing prices, stagnant wages and limited career prospects, many feel that political participation does not lead to meaningful change. As a result, some turn to third-party or independent candidates, not out of idealism, but out of desperation. The traditional parties have lost their credibility.
Recent political events have only intensified this disillusionment. For example, the pretrial detention of former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). To many observers, it appeared less like a matter of justice and more like political retaliation.
In a functioning democracy, the principle of “innocent until proven guilty” should be sacred. Yet the state’s actions seemed to challenge that core value.
This is no longer just about one political figure. It is about a broader system in which the law becomes a tool of power, not protection.
Even more troubling is the growing tendency among citizens to accept these conditions as normal. However, normalization of dysfunction is dangerous — it breeds apathy and civic disengagement. When people no longer believe in fairness or accountability, they lose trust in the system and withdraw from it. This withdrawal does not just hurt politics — it damages the social fabric.
If the next generation gives up on politics, who would shape Taiwan’s future?
We are taught to trust the government, obey the law and believe in democracy. However, reality keeps challenging those teachings. The most heartbreaking part is not that the system is broken — it is that we have started to accept the brokenness.
Chuang Po-wei is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS