A non-native teacher’s voice
The “Bilingual 2030” policy is an ambitious step by a non-native English-speaking country to embrace the language and compete globally. The policy not only brings challenges, but also new opportunities, especially for voices such as mine.
I am a student at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages. When I came to Taiwan from Indonesia, a friend recommended me a job as a part-time English teacher in a cram school.
As I taught more students, from elementary school to junior high, I realized that my strength was not just language ability, but also understanding what it feels like to learn English. I did not just teach vocabulary and grammar. I focused on building their confidence.
Many of my students perform well in reading, listening and writing. However, when it comes to speaking, they struggle a lot. They are used to textbook English, so when they are asked something slightly different, they get confused. I once asked a student, “How are you today?” and the answer I got was, “Today is Friday!” After class, I later learned that the word “today” confuses them, since they are more familiar with the question, “How are you?” It was a small moment, but it made me realize that students are trained to recognize sentence patterns, not to communicate naturally.
Another time, students gave me perfect answers on a written test, but froze during the oral test.
The fear of making mistakes slowed them down. That is why I focus on building their speaking confidence first. Not perfect grammar, not fancy vocabulary, just the courage to try. I became the teacher I wish I had growing up.
Their struggle to speak reminded me of my own journey learning English in Indonesia, and probably reflects what many non-native English teachers in Taiwan have experienced, too. I realized that shared experience is our strength as a teacher. We know how it feels to struggle with English and it gives us the tools to guide others with empathy and patience.
Despite my journey, I have still felt underestimated, simply because I am not a native speaker. Many schools and cram schools still prefer Western teachers, often based on their appearance. Friends of mine who are also non-native English teachers have shared similar experiences. We, as non-native English speakers, have walked the path our students are walking. That matters.
While taking a “Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages” course, the instructor asked: “Do you think someone who speaks the language can definitively teach the language?” That question stayed with me. My answer is, not always. Teaching takes more than fluency, it requires understanding, compassion, strategy and heart.
If Taiwan truly wants to become a bilingual country by 2030, it is time to recognize that the journey of learning can be just as valuable as fluency itself. Non-native English teachers could bring more than language skills, they also have studying experience. We do not just speak English, we have learned it and grown with it, just like what our students are expected to do.
Jocelyn Gaby
Kaohsiung
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS