In the face of US President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has ludicrously linked the tariffs’ impact on our nation with the mass recall movement their party is facing — a notion that is entirely nonsensical. Over the past year, the opposition parties have undermined the Constitution and thrown governance into chaos, bringing administrative bodies to near-paralysis. Now, in desperation, they are crying out for everyone to “stop the fighting.”
Is that not the pot calling the kettle black? None of the other countries facing Trump’s tariffs are in the midst of a recall movement — clearly, a recall has no connection with the likelihood of being impacted by tariffs.
If Taiwan wants to convince Trump to reduce those tariffs, it must decrease its trade surplus with the US, and to do that KMT lawmakers must be recalled. Blue camp legislators hold a pro-China, anti-US stance. They have consistently attempted to block purchases of arms and agricultural products from the US, making it impossible to reduce the trade surplus. Therefore, removing KMT legislators from office would remove the trade barriers between Taiwan and the US, and increase Taiwan’s imports of US-manufactured products, including weapons and agricultural goods.
Supporting anti-US KMT legislators would undoubtedly lead to higher tariffs against Taiwan. If our nation listens to the blue camp and latches itself onto China, our tariffs would increase from the current 32 percent to China’s 125 percent. As soon as Taiwan aligns itself closely with China — as soon as it becomes part of China’s dubious production schemes — the tariffs placed on our country could skyrocket to resemble those of Cambodia or Vietnam, at 49 percent and 46 percent respectively.
If Taiwan wants to mitigate the harm of Trump’s tariffs, recalling anti-US, pro-China KMT legislators would be a huge first step the public could take to work towards achieving that goal.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS