After the real-estate bubble burst, China’s purchasing power disappeared with it, and all its industries fell into a vicious cycle of price competition. Due to insufficient domestic demand, China has had to rely on exports to boost its GDP. As a result, its exports have grown rapidly in the past few years, turning a domestic problem into an international one.
Since the US-China tariff dispute, first triggered by US President Donald Trump in 2018 during his first term in office, China has taken measures such as relocating production lines overseas, which has not prevented exports from falling, but has instead led to a rapid increase.
China’s exports have grown significantly since then by more than US$150 billion each year, but imports have only increased slightly by about US$15 billion. The trade surplus continued to rise.
If that trend continues, China’s manufacturing industry might account for 42 percent of the world’s total by 2030. That would not only be unbearable for the US, but would also considerably affect Europe and Japan.
That is the issue the Trump 2.0 tariff campaign aims to address — by forcing China to drop export subsidies and stop externalizing its domestic economic problems — to create a healthier global trade environment.
During Trump’s first term, the tariff dispute targeted only China. Although many problems arose during its implementation, it was quite effective in curbing China.
However, Trump’s current tariff efforts have spread too wide and involve too many countries, especially the global “reciprocal tariff” plan that is to be announced today.
That plan would be difficult to implement, because it is too complicated and losing focus, which would give China a break, further worsening the global economic and trade environment, and even worse, offending many US allies.
During his first term, Trump raised tariffs on China from 3 percent to 19 percent. His successor, former US president Joe Biden basically continued that policy.
In response, many companies have relocated their production lines to ASEAN members, India and Mexico to avoid high US tariffs.
As a result, Mexico has replaced China as the largest exporter to the US, and the share of Chinese goods in the US has also dropped from 21 percent to 13 percent.
Meanwhile, exports from ASEAN members and India to the US have increased rapidly, and the shift of the supply chain has also caused China to lose a huge number of jobs.
As soon as he returned to the White House, Trump raised tariffs on China by 20 percent, bringing the new tariffs to about 40 percent. That part of the policy is not a big problem.
The only thing that needs to be corrected is that the US should coordinate with Mexico, Canada and other countries to join the US in forming a customs alliance to jointly increase tariffs on China to prevent Chinese goods from taking advantage of the loopholes for origin washing via those countries to evade US tariffs.
All countries under the same defense umbrella as the US should adopt the economic and trade policies toward China that are consistent with the US and use their collective strength to force China to make economic system reforms. Higher tariffs should only be applicable to the countries that are unwilling to join the US camp.
Honda Chen is head of the sustainable finance office at the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS