I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name.
With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with foreigners. Taiwan loves foreigners — unless you are the “wrong” kind. That thought crossed my mind when I encountered weird behavior from a store clerk; my questions were ignored and their attitude was unwelcoming. Yet, the moment a white foreigner walked in, their attitude changed. They became cheerful, polite and eager to help. At first, I wondered if it was because my Mandarin was still at a beginner’s level, but then I heard how the clerk praised the white foreigner’s Mandarin, appreciating their effort in a way that I never experienced.
The word “foreigner” has lost its true meaning. It has created an invisible divide. Some foreigners are welcomed with open arms, while others are treated as if they do not belong. In Taiwan, there would always be the “wanted” and “unwanted” foreigners.
Racism might be erased from our dictionaries, but stereotypes live on. Take cram schools for example, those with a “Hollywood look” have a higher chance of being hired as English teachers with better pay, even if they are not native speakers or qualified to teach. Meanwhile, those with Asian features, especially Southeast Asians, are often paid less and struggle to gain respect from students and fellow teachers. Being white carries more weight than actual skill, raising one simple question: Why?
Many Taiwanese associate Southeast Asians with migrant workers. While some do come for labor jobs, not all Southeast Asians are migrant workers. And even if they are, why should that justify discrimination? No matter how much people deny it, the reality is that Taiwan and its foreign workers rely on each other, and both sides benefit from that relationship. I am not saying that Taiwan would be nothing without people from other countries. However, with a declining birthrate and labor shortages, Taiwan heavily depends on foreign workers. Would Taiwan have achieved its level of development without them?
Think about it — without Southeast Asian caregivers, who would take care of elderly family members? Many elderly people in Taiwan might not be able to do their morning exercise routine at the park, or even worse, they might not have lived as long without the caregivers’ support.
Outside formal institutions, stereotypes are deeply immersed in everyday interactions on the streets of Taiwan. Store clerks greet Westerners with warm smiles, but that friendliness often fades when the next person in line is from Southeast Asia. That is why Western foreigners often describe Taiwanese as “very friendly” — but you are far less likely to hear the same from Southeast Asians.
As a Southeast Asian in Taiwan, I struggle to find a silver lining in that situation. There is little we can do to change deep-seated mindsets or erase harmful stereotypes.
Taiwan is a democratic country where people have the right to express themselves freely. However, breaking stereotypes and shifting perspectives? Do not expect too much — it would only happen if people are truly willing to change. The real question is: Are they even willing?
Adelynn Belicia Sinaga is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS