I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name.
With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with foreigners. Taiwan loves foreigners — unless you are the “wrong” kind. That thought crossed my mind when I encountered weird behavior from a store clerk; my questions were ignored and their attitude was unwelcoming. Yet, the moment a white foreigner walked in, their attitude changed. They became cheerful, polite and eager to help. At first, I wondered if it was because my Mandarin was still at a beginner’s level, but then I heard how the clerk praised the white foreigner’s Mandarin, appreciating their effort in a way that I never experienced.
The word “foreigner” has lost its true meaning. It has created an invisible divide. Some foreigners are welcomed with open arms, while others are treated as if they do not belong. In Taiwan, there would always be the “wanted” and “unwanted” foreigners.
Racism might be erased from our dictionaries, but stereotypes live on. Take cram schools for example, those with a “Hollywood look” have a higher chance of being hired as English teachers with better pay, even if they are not native speakers or qualified to teach. Meanwhile, those with Asian features, especially Southeast Asians, are often paid less and struggle to gain respect from students and fellow teachers. Being white carries more weight than actual skill, raising one simple question: Why?
Many Taiwanese associate Southeast Asians with migrant workers. While some do come for labor jobs, not all Southeast Asians are migrant workers. And even if they are, why should that justify discrimination? No matter how much people deny it, the reality is that Taiwan and its foreign workers rely on each other, and both sides benefit from that relationship. I am not saying that Taiwan would be nothing without people from other countries. However, with a declining birthrate and labor shortages, Taiwan heavily depends on foreign workers. Would Taiwan have achieved its level of development without them?
Think about it — without Southeast Asian caregivers, who would take care of elderly family members? Many elderly people in Taiwan might not be able to do their morning exercise routine at the park, or even worse, they might not have lived as long without the caregivers’ support.
Outside formal institutions, stereotypes are deeply immersed in everyday interactions on the streets of Taiwan. Store clerks greet Westerners with warm smiles, but that friendliness often fades when the next person in line is from Southeast Asia. That is why Western foreigners often describe Taiwanese as “very friendly” — but you are far less likely to hear the same from Southeast Asians.
As a Southeast Asian in Taiwan, I struggle to find a silver lining in that situation. There is little we can do to change deep-seated mindsets or erase harmful stereotypes.
Taiwan is a democratic country where people have the right to express themselves freely. However, breaking stereotypes and shifting perspectives? Do not expect too much — it would only happen if people are truly willing to change. The real question is: Are they even willing?
Adelynn Belicia Sinaga is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences