I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name.
With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with foreigners. Taiwan loves foreigners — unless you are the “wrong” kind. That thought crossed my mind when I encountered weird behavior from a store clerk; my questions were ignored and their attitude was unwelcoming. Yet, the moment a white foreigner walked in, their attitude changed. They became cheerful, polite and eager to help. At first, I wondered if it was because my Mandarin was still at a beginner’s level, but then I heard how the clerk praised the white foreigner’s Mandarin, appreciating their effort in a way that I never experienced.
The word “foreigner” has lost its true meaning. It has created an invisible divide. Some foreigners are welcomed with open arms, while others are treated as if they do not belong. In Taiwan, there would always be the “wanted” and “unwanted” foreigners.
Racism might be erased from our dictionaries, but stereotypes live on. Take cram schools for example, those with a “Hollywood look” have a higher chance of being hired as English teachers with better pay, even if they are not native speakers or qualified to teach. Meanwhile, those with Asian features, especially Southeast Asians, are often paid less and struggle to gain respect from students and fellow teachers. Being white carries more weight than actual skill, raising one simple question: Why?
Many Taiwanese associate Southeast Asians with migrant workers. While some do come for labor jobs, not all Southeast Asians are migrant workers. And even if they are, why should that justify discrimination? No matter how much people deny it, the reality is that Taiwan and its foreign workers rely on each other, and both sides benefit from that relationship. I am not saying that Taiwan would be nothing without people from other countries. However, with a declining birthrate and labor shortages, Taiwan heavily depends on foreign workers. Would Taiwan have achieved its level of development without them?
Think about it — without Southeast Asian caregivers, who would take care of elderly family members? Many elderly people in Taiwan might not be able to do their morning exercise routine at the park, or even worse, they might not have lived as long without the caregivers’ support.
Outside formal institutions, stereotypes are deeply immersed in everyday interactions on the streets of Taiwan. Store clerks greet Westerners with warm smiles, but that friendliness often fades when the next person in line is from Southeast Asia. That is why Western foreigners often describe Taiwanese as “very friendly” — but you are far less likely to hear the same from Southeast Asians.
As a Southeast Asian in Taiwan, I struggle to find a silver lining in that situation. There is little we can do to change deep-seated mindsets or erase harmful stereotypes.
Taiwan is a democratic country where people have the right to express themselves freely. However, breaking stereotypes and shifting perspectives? Do not expect too much — it would only happen if people are truly willing to change. The real question is: Are they even willing?
Adelynn Belicia Sinaga is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has