It was only when Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) instructed the Ministry of Economic Affairs to conduct a reasonable review of water utility prices that I realized prices have been frozen for 31 years.
In the past 17 years since I settled down in my hometown, I have received a water bill every two months, each only amounting to about NT$200. I was shocked at how cheap water prices are. Rates should have been raised long ago, and there are a number of reasons supporting an increase.
First, the minimum monthly wage has more than doubled, increasing from NT$14,010 in 1994 to NT$28,590 this year. That is the most basic and sufficient reason, especially given the increase in global inflation. Water prices should more accurately reflect the increased cost of water.
Second, a reasonable increase in water utility prices would encourage water conservation. A 5 or 6-liter bottle of mineral water only costs about NT$60 to NT$70 at the convenience store — a price members of the public are willing to pay. Additionally roadside water refill stations offer water for as cheap as NT$1 per liter, creating a booming business opportunity. Currently, the price for water usage per cubic meter below 10m3 is only NT$7.35. Could such a low price really encourage people to value or conserve water? At the same time, a price adjustment could encourage factories and businesses to install water recycling equipment, thereby fulfilling their social responsibility as major water consumers.
Last, Taiwan’s geographical conditions make it quite difficult to find suitable locations for new reservoirs — sedimentation reduces the actual carrying capacity of existing reservoirs and, impacts from extreme weather lead to uneven rainfall distribution. Economic development requires the support of natural resources such as water. By reasonably adjusting water prices, we could alleviate water shortages and increase our overall supply.
I live in a three-and-a-half story townhouse. For my everyday water usage — laundry, cooking, watering plants, bathing and so on — my total water utility costs average at about NT$3 per day. Is a rate this low really reasonable?
Wang Juei-hsing is a former chief of the Taiwan Provincial Government’s Land Development Division.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS