It was only when Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) instructed the Ministry of Economic Affairs to conduct a reasonable review of water utility prices that I realized prices have been frozen for 31 years.
In the past 17 years since I settled down in my hometown, I have received a water bill every two months, each only amounting to about NT$200. I was shocked at how cheap water prices are. Rates should have been raised long ago, and there are a number of reasons supporting an increase.
First, the minimum monthly wage has more than doubled, increasing from NT$14,010 in 1994 to NT$28,590 this year. That is the most basic and sufficient reason, especially given the increase in global inflation. Water prices should more accurately reflect the increased cost of water.
Second, a reasonable increase in water utility prices would encourage water conservation. A 5 or 6-liter bottle of mineral water only costs about NT$60 to NT$70 at the convenience store — a price members of the public are willing to pay. Additionally roadside water refill stations offer water for as cheap as NT$1 per liter, creating a booming business opportunity. Currently, the price for water usage per cubic meter below 10m3 is only NT$7.35. Could such a low price really encourage people to value or conserve water? At the same time, a price adjustment could encourage factories and businesses to install water recycling equipment, thereby fulfilling their social responsibility as major water consumers.
Last, Taiwan’s geographical conditions make it quite difficult to find suitable locations for new reservoirs — sedimentation reduces the actual carrying capacity of existing reservoirs and, impacts from extreme weather lead to uneven rainfall distribution. Economic development requires the support of natural resources such as water. By reasonably adjusting water prices, we could alleviate water shortages and increase our overall supply.
I live in a three-and-a-half story townhouse. For my everyday water usage — laundry, cooking, watering plants, bathing and so on — my total water utility costs average at about NT$3 per day. Is a rate this low really reasonable?
Wang Juei-hsing is a former chief of the Taiwan Provincial Government’s Land Development Division.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,