In the turquoise waters of Indonesia’s Derawan Archipelago, a deafening dynamite blast shatters the morning calm, trumpeting the ongoing destruction of one of the world’s most biodiverse marine ecosystems.
Located within Southeast Asia’s Coral Triangle, Derawan — often called the “Amazon of the Seas” for the richness of its biodiversity — teems with marine life, from hammerhead and whale sharks to green and hawksbill turtles, all thriving among coral reefs, seagrass beds and mangroves.
Beyond its ecological significance, the archipelago sustains local communities across the Sulawesi Sea and acts as a vital buffer against the effects of climate change. However, despite its status as a marine protected area (MPA), Derawan is increasingly threatened by poaching syndicates harvesting turtle eggs with impunity, illegal fishers plundering its underwater riches and plastic waste — carried by ocean currents — choking marine life and defiling its once-pristine beaches.
The 30 by 30 initiative, which aims to protect 30 percent of the ocean by 2030, offers hope for global conservation efforts, but the growing threats to Derawan and other marine ecosystems highlight a stark disconnect between ambitious international targets and reality on the ground.
Although the 285,000 hectare Berau MPA, home to Derawan, is officially designated as a protected area, available resources limit its effective management. For example, a single three-day boat patrol costs 30 million rupiah (US$1,826). The Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, the authority responsible for managing and protecting the MPA from illegal activities, typically allocates only about 200 million rupiahs annually. Consequently, the MPA is not monitored consistently, leaving gaps in surveillance.
This underscores a simple truth: Ambitious goals mean little without the resources needed to advance them. Derawan’s designation as an MPA was a major political milestone, but its ecosystems would continue to deteriorate without adequate monitoring and enforcement.
Regrettably, MPAs around the world face similar challenges.
The 30 by 30 campaign has raised global awareness, but the decline of the Derawan Archipelago illustrates the limits of broad conservation targets. In reality, the responsibility for stopping poachers falls on underfunded local rangers who lack the means to combat environmental degradation effectively. Some, struggling to make ends meet, are lured into illegal activities such as poaching turtle eggs.
Derawan should serve as a cautionary tale and a call to action — a powerful reminder of what is at stake and what must be done to protect our oceans. Most importantly, genuine protection means more than drawing lines on a map. It requires sustained funding for ranger teams, marine patrols and local partnerships. Investment in drones, radar systems and communications equipment is critical to bolstering enforcement, while education and sustainable fishing initiatives can address the root causes of poaching, bomb fishing and other illegal activities.
The costs of inaction are enormous. Coral reefs that take centuries to grow can be wiped out in seconds by bomb fishing. As species disappear, marine ecosystems become increasingly unstable, jeopardizing livelihoods that are closely tied to ocean health.
Global Conservation, where I work, directly funds marine parks around the world, helping them establish rigorous monitoring and enforcement protocols to ensure they are not protected only on paper, but while non-governmental organizations can provide resources and expertise, they cannot tackle this daunting challenge alone. Governments must commit to funding and implementing the necessary measures to make MPAs truly effective.
If there is one lesson to be learned from Derawan, it is the need for active government involvement. Without national commitment, MPAs would remain vulnerable to unchecked exploitation.
Indonesia is a case in point. The absence of a strong official commitment is the single biggest factor behind Derawan’s ongoing decline. Grassroots initiatives, often supported by non-governmental organizations, have laid the groundwork for effective protection policies, but despite widespread support for action among local communities — including fishers — the Indonesian government has yet to act.
Policymakers worldwide must recognize that signing pledges at international summits is not enough — fulfilling them demands robust policies backed by substantial funding for conservation and enforcement efforts, especially in remote areas rich in biodiversity. Meanwhile, scientists, non-governmental organizations and international bodies such as the UN must go beyond awareness campaigns and contribute directly to maritime protection projects.
The benefits of well-managed MPAs are undeniable. Thriving fish populations replenish commercial fishing grounds, healthy coral reefs protect shorelines, and a booming ecotourism industry creates local jobs and fuels economic growth, all while preserving natural ecosystems.
Although many MPAs exist only on paper, there is still time to change course. Derawan is a prime example of policy failure and growing vulnerability, but with coordinated global action, it could become a model for building resilience in the face of a rapidly changing climate.
Dadang Mujiono is Indonesia director at Global Conservation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
The following case, which I experienced as an interpreter, illustrates that many issues in Taiwan’s legal system originate from law enforcement personnel. The problem stems not so much from their education and training, but their personal attitude — characterized by excessive self-confidence paired with a lack of accountability. One day at 10:30am, I was called to a police station in New Taipei City for an emergency. I arrived an hour later. A man was tied to a chair, having been arrested at the airport due to an outstanding arrest warrant. It quickly became apparent that the case was related to
RSS