In the turquoise waters of Indonesia’s Derawan Archipelago, a deafening dynamite blast shatters the morning calm, trumpeting the ongoing destruction of one of the world’s most biodiverse marine ecosystems.
Located within Southeast Asia’s Coral Triangle, Derawan — often called the “Amazon of the Seas” for the richness of its biodiversity — teems with marine life, from hammerhead and whale sharks to green and hawksbill turtles, all thriving among coral reefs, seagrass beds and mangroves.
Beyond its ecological significance, the archipelago sustains local communities across the Sulawesi Sea and acts as a vital buffer against the effects of climate change. However, despite its status as a marine protected area (MPA), Derawan is increasingly threatened by poaching syndicates harvesting turtle eggs with impunity, illegal fishers plundering its underwater riches and plastic waste — carried by ocean currents — choking marine life and defiling its once-pristine beaches.
The 30 by 30 initiative, which aims to protect 30 percent of the ocean by 2030, offers hope for global conservation efforts, but the growing threats to Derawan and other marine ecosystems highlight a stark disconnect between ambitious international targets and reality on the ground.
Although the 285,000 hectare Berau MPA, home to Derawan, is officially designated as a protected area, available resources limit its effective management. For example, a single three-day boat patrol costs 30 million rupiah (US$1,826). The Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, the authority responsible for managing and protecting the MPA from illegal activities, typically allocates only about 200 million rupiahs annually. Consequently, the MPA is not monitored consistently, leaving gaps in surveillance.
This underscores a simple truth: Ambitious goals mean little without the resources needed to advance them. Derawan’s designation as an MPA was a major political milestone, but its ecosystems would continue to deteriorate without adequate monitoring and enforcement.
Regrettably, MPAs around the world face similar challenges.
The 30 by 30 campaign has raised global awareness, but the decline of the Derawan Archipelago illustrates the limits of broad conservation targets. In reality, the responsibility for stopping poachers falls on underfunded local rangers who lack the means to combat environmental degradation effectively. Some, struggling to make ends meet, are lured into illegal activities such as poaching turtle eggs.
Derawan should serve as a cautionary tale and a call to action — a powerful reminder of what is at stake and what must be done to protect our oceans. Most importantly, genuine protection means more than drawing lines on a map. It requires sustained funding for ranger teams, marine patrols and local partnerships. Investment in drones, radar systems and communications equipment is critical to bolstering enforcement, while education and sustainable fishing initiatives can address the root causes of poaching, bomb fishing and other illegal activities.
The costs of inaction are enormous. Coral reefs that take centuries to grow can be wiped out in seconds by bomb fishing. As species disappear, marine ecosystems become increasingly unstable, jeopardizing livelihoods that are closely tied to ocean health.
Global Conservation, where I work, directly funds marine parks around the world, helping them establish rigorous monitoring and enforcement protocols to ensure they are not protected only on paper, but while non-governmental organizations can provide resources and expertise, they cannot tackle this daunting challenge alone. Governments must commit to funding and implementing the necessary measures to make MPAs truly effective.
If there is one lesson to be learned from Derawan, it is the need for active government involvement. Without national commitment, MPAs would remain vulnerable to unchecked exploitation.
Indonesia is a case in point. The absence of a strong official commitment is the single biggest factor behind Derawan’s ongoing decline. Grassroots initiatives, often supported by non-governmental organizations, have laid the groundwork for effective protection policies, but despite widespread support for action among local communities — including fishers — the Indonesian government has yet to act.
Policymakers worldwide must recognize that signing pledges at international summits is not enough — fulfilling them demands robust policies backed by substantial funding for conservation and enforcement efforts, especially in remote areas rich in biodiversity. Meanwhile, scientists, non-governmental organizations and international bodies such as the UN must go beyond awareness campaigns and contribute directly to maritime protection projects.
The benefits of well-managed MPAs are undeniable. Thriving fish populations replenish commercial fishing grounds, healthy coral reefs protect shorelines, and a booming ecotourism industry creates local jobs and fuels economic growth, all while preserving natural ecosystems.
Although many MPAs exist only on paper, there is still time to change course. Derawan is a prime example of policy failure and growing vulnerability, but with coordinated global action, it could become a model for building resilience in the face of a rapidly changing climate.
Dadang Mujiono is Indonesia director at Global Conservation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS