At a US Senate confirmation hearing last week, Republican Senator Dan Sullivan singled out the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for cutting Taiwan’s national defense budget, saying it is “playing a dangerous game.”
The KMT, in its usual fashion, said the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had misled the US about the budget. The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) likewise accused the DPP of “deceiving” the US, insisting that the budget cuts were smaller than last year’s at less than 1 percent.
In reality, 70 percent, or up to NT$178.1 billion (US$5.41 billion), of the Ministry of National Defense’s operational budget has been frozen.
Association of Strategic Foresight researcher Chieh Chung (揭仲) said the ministry is likely to have a gap in operational funding — ranging from at least nine days to one month — during the first half of this year. During that period, although the military’s combat readiness and training missions would not completely stop, many operations would be affected. Some units are also at risk of running out of resources.
Under former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), to maintain a military of 600,000 soldiers and “a sky full of stars,” they appointed a bunch of high-ranking officers who had never won a battle, or as some say: “officers who would lose the battle, but win the retreat.”
Defense spending at the time made up more than 80 percent of the national budget, with the KMT often quoting Sun Zi (孫子), from The Art of War (孫子兵法): “Rely not on the likelihood of the enemy’s not coming, but on our own readiness to receive him.”
However, following the deaths of the Chiangs, the KMT has transformed into a party that relies on the likelihood of the enemy’s not coming and lacks the readiness to receive them. Their favorite slogans are: “Don’t provoke the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)” and “Maintain cross-strait peace.”
Now, under the guise of freezing the national budget, they are disrupting and effectively dismantling Taiwan’s military preparedness. From the perspective of the US, which has always been concerned about Taiwan becoming a flash point in the Indo-Pacific region, that behavior is intolerable.
Now that the US has spoken out, KMT and TPP legislators are playing the same tune, claiming that the DPP is “deceiving” the US. Out of consideration for its own national interests, the US has personnel stationed in Taiwan to gather political intelligence and conduct cross-comparisons to ensure it gains a comprehensive understanding by hearing all sides. How could it possibly be misled by the DPP?
The US has called out those they perceive to be aligned with the CCP, criticizing them for recklessly cutting and freezing the defense budget. If the KMT and TPP continue to ignore the issue, believing they can deceive the US with mere rhetoric, while disregarding Sullivan’s warning, what will the consequences be? That is something they need to think long and hard about.
John Yu is a civil servant in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS