US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement.
Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan.
He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think about collective self defense without relying on the US.
Friedrich Merz, poised to be the next German chancellor, has said that his “absolute priority will be to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible so that we can achieve real independence from the USA, step by step,” and that Europe should potentially find a replacement for NATO.
Trump has only been in office for a little more than a month. They say a week is a long time in politics: Geopolitics is rarely upended in such a short amount of time.
For Taiwan, and especially since the world finally woke to the true nature of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a discernible story arc largely in Taiwan’s favor, with like-minded nations, under US encouragement, voicing support for peace in the Taiwan Strait.
That arc has evaporated. Some voices, such as Fukuyama’s, are concerned about a collapse of the world order. Some, including a contributor on today’s page, James J. Y. Hsu (許正餘), see reason for optimism.
The point is that we have no idea what the future holds. Can Taiwan still depend on US backing in the face of aggression from the CCP?
US skepticism could previously be put down to a campaign strategy by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and other pro-China forces; it has now become a more difficult position to refute.
For now at least, US presidents are limited to two terms in office; Trump only has four more years left. However, the current situation is a wake-up call for many nations around the world. There is a recognition that postwar Europe has been overreliant on the US for its security. That realization is not only overdue, it is possibly also too late.
Regional nations such as Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia, all of whom had previously relied on the promise of US support, find themselves in a similar position. In the absence of assured support, this overdependence on one nation needs to be addressed.
This does not mean assuming a lack of US assistance, and one must also recognize that, for valid reasons, Taiwan is “not Ukraine,” and Trump does appear to be redirecting his attention from Europe to the Indo-Pacific region. However, it does add more urgency for Taiwan to bolster its ability to defend itself, possibly with more assured assistance from regional powers such as South Korea, Japan, the Philippines and Australia.
This will be difficult to achieve: Unlike Europe, East Asia has no established security architecture like NATO on which to build.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs says that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently reiterated US support for Taiwan in line with the Taiwan Relations Act and the “six assurances.”
However, we appear to be in uncharted territory: How the new reality plays out could go in Taiwan’s favor; it could equally lead to disaster.
There is a renewed urgency on planning for the nation’s long-term security in a new security environment, and nothing should be taken for granted.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
RSS