US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement.
Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan.
He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think about collective self defense without relying on the US.
Friedrich Merz, poised to be the next German chancellor, has said that his “absolute priority will be to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible so that we can achieve real independence from the USA, step by step,” and that Europe should potentially find a replacement for NATO.
Trump has only been in office for a little more than a month. They say a week is a long time in politics: Geopolitics is rarely upended in such a short amount of time.
For Taiwan, and especially since the world finally woke to the true nature of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a discernible story arc largely in Taiwan’s favor, with like-minded nations, under US encouragement, voicing support for peace in the Taiwan Strait.
That arc has evaporated. Some voices, such as Fukuyama’s, are concerned about a collapse of the world order. Some, including a contributor on today’s page, James J. Y. Hsu (許正餘), see reason for optimism.
The point is that we have no idea what the future holds. Can Taiwan still depend on US backing in the face of aggression from the CCP?
US skepticism could previously be put down to a campaign strategy by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and other pro-China forces; it has now become a more difficult position to refute.
For now at least, US presidents are limited to two terms in office; Trump only has four more years left. However, the current situation is a wake-up call for many nations around the world. There is a recognition that postwar Europe has been overreliant on the US for its security. That realization is not only overdue, it is possibly also too late.
Regional nations such as Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Australia, all of whom had previously relied on the promise of US support, find themselves in a similar position. In the absence of assured support, this overdependence on one nation needs to be addressed.
This does not mean assuming a lack of US assistance, and one must also recognize that, for valid reasons, Taiwan is “not Ukraine,” and Trump does appear to be redirecting his attention from Europe to the Indo-Pacific region. However, it does add more urgency for Taiwan to bolster its ability to defend itself, possibly with more assured assistance from regional powers such as South Korea, Japan, the Philippines and Australia.
This will be difficult to achieve: Unlike Europe, East Asia has no established security architecture like NATO on which to build.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs says that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently reiterated US support for Taiwan in line with the Taiwan Relations Act and the “six assurances.”
However, we appear to be in uncharted territory: How the new reality plays out could go in Taiwan’s favor; it could equally lead to disaster.
There is a renewed urgency on planning for the nation’s long-term security in a new security environment, and nothing should be taken for granted.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS