The EU’s leaders have rightly been focused on mitigating the damage that Washington’s new trade war threatens to inflict upon their economies. Yet amid the havoc, there is an opportunity that they should not miss — one that could help them solve some pressing financial problems.
It is hard to overstate the benefits the US has derived from its Founding Fathers’ decision, in the late 18th century, to grant its treasury the power to issue federal obligations and collect the taxes to pay them. Since then, US Treasury securities have become the haven where the world keeps its money. They form the foundation of the US’ capital markets, facilitating investment in everything from infrastructure to artificial intelligence.
The new administration’s economic policies could well undermine that special status. Its ill-considered, chaotically imposed tariffs would fuel inflation and uncertainty, making Treasury securities a riskier proposition. If the US Congress makes the 2017 tax cuts permanent, the multitrillion US dollar debt issuance required to finance the yawning budget deficit would further burden a government-debt market that has already shown signs of strain.
None of that bodes well for the US or the global economy. However, it does create an opportunity: If some other entity could establish a high-quality, highly liquid safe asset to compete with the US Treasury, it could reap some of the immense financial advantages the US has long enjoyed.
Yet who has the necessary credibility, scale and capacity to absorb global capital?
That is where the EU comes in. It needs to raise hundreds of billions of euros in the coming years to invest in EU-wide public goods, including stronger defenses against a belligerent Russia, better infrastructure and a greener economy. It also desperately needs a common safe asset to help unite its fragmented, underdeveloped capital markets. EU bonds, backed by the joint fiscal resources of its member states, could offer a solution to all those problems.
Granted, the EU has not always distinguished itself in fiscal matters. The euro area nearly split apart in the 2010s over Greece’s excessive borrowing. However, so far the bloc has always muddled through, and it recently adopted an improved framework to keep debts and deficits under control. Its member states’ budgets are much closer to balance than the US’. It also has some experience issuing joint debt, having raised hundreds of billions of euros under its NextGenerationEU program, designed to aid recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Political obstacles abound. Northern member states, notably Germany, worry about free riding. The benefits of defense spending, for example, would not necessarily be distributed equitably across EU members: Some are closer to Russia; some would receive more military orders than others. Such problems could be addressed by focusing any mutually financed investment on clearly EU-wide public goods (think air defense or combating climate change) and by forming different coalitions for different goals. Ideally, the EU would designate specific revenue for repayment — green transition bonds, for instance, could be backed by proceeds from an expanded emissions trading system.
The European Commission is supposed to propose a new long-term budget this year, which could be propitious timing. Europe’s leaders increasingly recognize that they cannot address their investment challenges without greater cooperation. If they can demonstrate the political will to raise the necessary public capital, private capital would follow. There might never be a better chance.
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS