The EU’s leaders have rightly been focused on mitigating the damage that Washington’s new trade war threatens to inflict upon their economies. Yet amid the havoc, there is an opportunity that they should not miss — one that could help them solve some pressing financial problems.
It is hard to overstate the benefits the US has derived from its Founding Fathers’ decision, in the late 18th century, to grant its treasury the power to issue federal obligations and collect the taxes to pay them. Since then, US Treasury securities have become the haven where the world keeps its money. They form the foundation of the US’ capital markets, facilitating investment in everything from infrastructure to artificial intelligence.
The new administration’s economic policies could well undermine that special status. Its ill-considered, chaotically imposed tariffs would fuel inflation and uncertainty, making Treasury securities a riskier proposition. If the US Congress makes the 2017 tax cuts permanent, the multitrillion US dollar debt issuance required to finance the yawning budget deficit would further burden a government-debt market that has already shown signs of strain.
None of that bodes well for the US or the global economy. However, it does create an opportunity: If some other entity could establish a high-quality, highly liquid safe asset to compete with the US Treasury, it could reap some of the immense financial advantages the US has long enjoyed.
Yet who has the necessary credibility, scale and capacity to absorb global capital?
That is where the EU comes in. It needs to raise hundreds of billions of euros in the coming years to invest in EU-wide public goods, including stronger defenses against a belligerent Russia, better infrastructure and a greener economy. It also desperately needs a common safe asset to help unite its fragmented, underdeveloped capital markets. EU bonds, backed by the joint fiscal resources of its member states, could offer a solution to all those problems.
Granted, the EU has not always distinguished itself in fiscal matters. The euro area nearly split apart in the 2010s over Greece’s excessive borrowing. However, so far the bloc has always muddled through, and it recently adopted an improved framework to keep debts and deficits under control. Its member states’ budgets are much closer to balance than the US’. It also has some experience issuing joint debt, having raised hundreds of billions of euros under its NextGenerationEU program, designed to aid recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Political obstacles abound. Northern member states, notably Germany, worry about free riding. The benefits of defense spending, for example, would not necessarily be distributed equitably across EU members: Some are closer to Russia; some would receive more military orders than others. Such problems could be addressed by focusing any mutually financed investment on clearly EU-wide public goods (think air defense or combating climate change) and by forming different coalitions for different goals. Ideally, the EU would designate specific revenue for repayment — green transition bonds, for instance, could be backed by proceeds from an expanded emissions trading system.
The European Commission is supposed to propose a new long-term budget this year, which could be propitious timing. Europe’s leaders increasingly recognize that they cannot address their investment challenges without greater cooperation. If they can demonstrate the political will to raise the necessary public capital, private capital would follow. There might never be a better chance.
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times