Since his return to the White House, US President Donald Trump has upended Washington’s trade policy. Trump forced Colombia to accept deported migrants by threatening a 25 percent tariff on all Colombian goods. He also announced a 25 percent additional tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico — which he later paused for 30 days following talks with Canadian and Mexican leaders — and a 10 percent additional tariff on imports from China.
Trump has said that he would raise tariffs on goods from the EU.
On Friday, at a meeting with visiting Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Trump said he was considering announcing reciprocal tariffs on many countries this week.
While Trump did not specify which countries would be targeted nor provide any details on reciprocal tariffs, his latest pronouncements suggest a shift from his campaign promise of imposing universal tariffs of 10 to 20 percent on all imports into the US.
It would also be a major escalation of his trade disputes with US trade partners if it triggers an across-the-board increase in retaliatory tariffs.
Thus far, Trump has cited concerns over illegal immigration, drug trafficking and trade deficits for his tariff threats, but his main purpose is to restore the US manufacturing industry and curb China’s technology development. It might also be a political tactic leveraging tariffs to make up for the shortfall in tax revenue due to his plans to cut domestic taxes.
The reciprocal tariffs idea is worth noting. Trump during his presidential campaign said that he would work with the US Congress to pass the US Reciprocal Trade Act, which would give him the authority to increase tariffs on imported goods to match the tariffs that a foreign country imposes on similar US goods.
Trump’s real target appears to be countries with significant trade surpluses with the US, as well as those that have particularly high tariff differentials with it. In either case, Taipei is likely to be one of Washington’s next targets.
US Department of Commerce data showed that the US trade deficit last year increased 17 percent to a record US$918 billion. China topped the list, with a trade surplus of US$361.03 billion, followed by Mexico with a record trade surplus of US$172 billion. Other countries that had significant trade surpluses with the US last year include Vietnam, Ireland, Germany, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Canada and Thailand.
Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro said that the targets for reciprocal tariffs are China and India, followed by the EU, Thailand, Taiwan and Vietnam, with Japan and Malaysia being in the third tier of targets.
As Japan would soon begin importing a record amount of US liquefied natural gas to reduce the US trade deficit with Japan and address the reciprocal tariff threat, per the meeting between Ishiba and Trump, Taiwan could follow Tokyo’s example by importing more US energy. This could also help accelerate domestic energy transformation.
In the near term, engaging in intensive contacts with Trump administration officials and aligning with Trump’s “America First” agenda would give Taiwan an edge over its competitors. Longer term, boosting purchases of US weapons and agricultural products, and collaborating with the US in fields such as drones, semiconductors and artificial intelligence could demonstrate the nation’s determination to maintain a firm relationship with Washington.
It is undeniable that reciprocal tariffs would intensify trade tensions and weaken global trade and economic growth. They are bound to affect export-reliant Taiwan, but they also provide the country with an opportunity to re-examine its economic relations with the US, diversify its export markets and strengthen economic cooperation with Japan, South Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Europe to enhance supply chain resilience.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military