Imperial monarchies can transform into constitutional monarchies through democratization, with the progressive, or left, and conservative, or right, camps ruling by choice. Some imperial monarchies directly turn into “people’s democratic dictatorships” through communist revolutions, which are just communist dictatorships in practice. Based on leftist ideology, these so-called “people’s democracies” become communist autocratic regimes. Both left-wing and right-wing political parties have the potential to become authoritarian and totalitarian.
The right-wing regime of Adolf Hitler was a historical catastrophe, but was the left-wing regime of Joseph Stalin not also a historical catastrophe? And what about communist China under Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) rule? Whether right or left, only in a true democratic system can the meaning and value of progressivism and conservatism be realized.
Some people think that being leftist is politically correct, but much like the right-wing views of political correctness, this is a form of dogmatic thinking that illustrates a cognitive blind spot.
A country, by nature, might be conservative and right-leaning because of its vertical values and boundaries, while progressive leftist values exist in society to regulate the excesses of these vertical values. Only a society that is compatible with both left-wing and right-wing ideologies has the ability to shape a normal nation.
Originally, communism was able to grow and thrive as a fight against capitalism, but it can only rule by totalitarianism and autocracy and is not in line with rational economic principles. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was able to achieve a level of economic prosperity through capitalist reforms, but, as the nature of its rule was essentially unchanged, such prosperity cannot be sustained. The communist slogan “Workers of the world, unite” is meaningless rhetoric due to the walls blocking off the nation, and nationalism is still the guiding principle of communist China.
US President Donald Trump is a conservative, right-wing politician. His slogan “Make America Great Again” fully reflects vertical national values. The US has no history of aggressive colonization. However, just like most former colonial powers, it is facing immigration issues and the strike against leftism, progressivism and other horizontal values. If we take Sigmund Freud’s theory of personality development as an analogy, the US has developed from the “id,” the instinctual self, to the “ego,” the rational self, but has not yet reached the “superego,” the moral and higher self.
Perhaps the US has lost its magnanimity in this way; nonetheless, it is still a democracy ruled by law. Moreover, the US is a federation that grants a high degree of autonomy to its states’ governments. As such, the US’ democratic rule of law should cure its “Trump syndrome” eventually — unlike the People’s Republic of China, whose one-party dictatorship is endless, while democracy appears hopeless.
For Taiwan to become a normal nation, it must have both left-wing and right-wing political parties instead of constantly swinging between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) contradictory stance of being both pro-communist and anti-communist is detrimental not only for Taiwan, but also for the Chinese people, as it only strengthens the CCP’s authoritarianism.
Taiwanese must uphold democratic beliefs and strengthen the rule of law to remain an independent and normal nation, separate from China.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS