Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget.
The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed NT$2 billion budget — and up to 70 percent of ministerial expenses.
This week, the Legislative Yuan would continue to discuss and vote on the central government’s total budget, as well as hundreds of proposals by KMT and TPP lawmakers to cut specific items.
Although it is within the Legislative Yuan’s power to freeze or cut the government’s budget, the reasons opposition party lawmakers put forward for their budget proposals have generated a public backlash.
KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) submitted a motion to slash the entire NT$2.309 billion budget of Public Television Service (PTS) and its subsidiaries, claiming that the broadcaster only serves the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while other KMT legislators proposed cutting arts and culture grants. The motions were immediately denounced by leading figures in the film and arts industry, while academics launched a petition and urged recalls. KMT lawmakers later backed away from eliminating PTS’ budget allocation in favor of a more modest NT$23 million, or 1 percent, reduction.
Other cuts with absurd rationales include cutting the gender equity budget because “there were too many sexual assault cases”; cutting a ministry’s advertising budget because it has used “blue and white colors in its ‘extremely ugly’ ad picture, as if vilifying the KMT and TPP”; and cutting NT$200 million from the police budget to “effectively fight scams and fraud, so that people will not fall victim to scams.”
Opposition lawmakers have also proposed cutting NT$100 million for firefighters’ helmets and protective equipment due to “concerns that they would be used for war preparedness,” and cutting NT$400 million from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ budget, because “Honduras cut diplomatic ties with Taiwan.”
More people and organizations have voiced concerns over such proposals, which they said would drastically affect people’s livelihoods, public safety and social welfare.
However, the KMT and TPP do not seem to be worried about the public reaction. The two parties said the cuts are necessary to tighten supervision over the “corrupt” DPP and prevent it from spending money on propaganda to “attack the opposition” and “brainwash people.”
They pledged to pass further cuts this week.
After KMT and TPP lawmakers took a majority of the Legislative Yuan in February last year, they focused on expanding their legislative power in the first legislative session, but the Constitutional Court ruled that most of their bills were unconstitutional.
During the second session, the opposition legislators started taking more extreme retaliatory measures to paralyze the court and slash the government budget to incapacitate it.
If voters stay indifferent or silently endure the harm caused by the budget cuts, KMT and TPP lawmakers would only become more emboldened to disregard the Constitution. Chen last week called a director who questioned the PTS budget cut “a wicked servant bullying the master,” implying that it is the lawmakers who are masters. She has forgotten that she should be a “servant” serving the public humbly, not bullying those who question her.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS