The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week released the latest job vacancy data in Taiwan, which highlighted how many job openings firms had yet to be filled at the end of August last year. The data also revealed how the vacant positions were closely related to the business climate that industrial and services sectors faced at the time.
The DGBAS collects data on job vacancies at the end of February, May, August and November every year. The number of job vacancies includes recruits for expanding operations and additional production lines as well as for openings related to quitting, layoffs and retirement. However, vacant positions due to a recruitment freeze, internal recruitment and expatriate vacancies are excluded.
At the end of August last year, there were 248,036 job openings in the nation’s 17 major industries — such as manufacturing, information technology, electricity and gas supply, construction, wholesale and retail trade, transportation, accommodation and food services, financial and insurance services, real-estate, and support services. The number was the highest for the same period in three years, up 6,208 from the end of May and an increase of 3,683 from a year earlier, DGBAS data showed.
The manufacturing industry had the most job vacancies at 87,456, up 12,117 from a year earlier, due to rising labor demand related to electronic components, information technology products and emerging applications, the agency said.
Meanwhile, the wholesale and retail trade sector saw vacancies drop by 2,179 year-on-year to 39,684, the construction industry posted 4,779 fewer job openings at 15,345, and vacancies in accommodation and food services declined by 2,721 to 20,741, it added.
In terms of the job vacancy rate, which refers to the number of job openings as a percentage of employment plus job openings over a specific period, the DGBAS reported an overall job vacancy rate of 2.84 percent at the end of August, which was also the highest for the same period in three years, with the electricity and gas supply industry topping others at a rate of 4.72 percent, followed by the computer, electronics and optical products industry at 4.1 percent, and accommodation and food services at 3.7 percent.
The vacancy rate in the real-estate industry was 2.92 percent, a decrease of 0.65 percentage points from the same period last year and reaching a new low for the past 18 years, which reflected a cooling housing market due to the central bank’s selective credit control measures and resulted in a contraction in personnel demand.
As the central bank adopted a new wave of selective credit controls in September last year, how much impact its move would have on the industry’s workforce demand deserves further attention.
Observing the job vacancy rate regularly is important, because the data suggest the situation of labor demand, workforce management and the attractiveness of the job opportunities. If the rate stays high for long, it means that firms would need to find new ways to expand the workforce through attracting talent from unconventional pools, recruiting workers from abroad, offering more flexible work, encouraging people to work beyond standard retirement ages, and adopting automation or other practices to unlock productivity. In contrast, if the rate continues to remain low, it could imply that substantial market demand exists for the advertised job openings.
Overall, job vacancy rates in different industries vary and are tied to their seasonal business demand. Because the cost of vacancies is dependent on a range of factors, there is no universal formula for calculating it. However, it is worth mentioning that for firms, filling vacant positions is frequently cheaper than paying overtime, and is more conducive to enhancing performance and productivity, and maintaining customer satisfaction.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS