The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) are promoting an amendment to the Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法) that would exempt people aged 65 and older in a low tax bracket from paying National Health Insurance (NHI) premiums. While it appears to care for the elder generation, it is nothing more than a ploy to exchange health insurance payments for votes. The NHI program is already experiencing severe financial strain. Promoting such a policy would only worsen that financial crisis and ultimately harm all Taiwanese.
While the majority of NHI revenue comes from the wages of young adults, the majority of its expenditures go to elderly people. As the elderly population increases, the burden on young adults grows heavier. Last year, National Health Insurance Administration data showed that the NHI’s revenue growth is limited, while its expenditures are rapidly increasing — the key factor being that the aging population has caused medical needs to surge. Exempting people over the age of 65 from paying NHI premiums is tantamount to digging a bigger hole for a financial pool that is already drained.
Most importantly, that policy would exacerbate generational inequality. The younger generation would become the main force financially supporting the NHI system, essentially forcing them to bear the burden of the entire country, further worsening their economic pressure. That scenario is like that of a family’s older generation refusing to assist with household spending, instead making their children bear the full burden of household costs. Eventually, it would lead the younger generation to lose all trust in the NHI system — they might even decide to opt out.
Exempting people older than 65 from paying NHI premiums also contravenes the principles of ability and fairness. Some elderly folks indeed require economic support, but many of them earn stable incomes — with some even extremely wealthy. If everyone were treated equally and exempt from paying premiums, the economically disadvantaged would suffer.
The most concerning aspect of that policy is that it resembles a ploy to buy votes. Calculations show that exempting people over the age of 65 from paying premiums would cost an extra NT$35 billion (US$1.07 billion). That huge sum would have to be diverted from the resources of other public programs, such as child welfare, women’s protection, and support for people with physical and mental disabilities — it could even impact the development of public education and infrastructure programs. On the surface, that strategy looks like it has elderly people’s interests in mind, but it would only sacrifice the interests of Taiwanese to serve the temporary political interests of the KMT and TPP.
The NHI system is a resource collectively shared by all Taiwanese. Therefore, it must be operated and implemented on the foundation of equality and sustainability — the entire system cannot be sacrificed to earn the votes of specific groups. The KMT and TPP must stop that short-sighted and self-serving political operation and instead place their focus on optimizing the allocation of public resources. We must help the disadvantaged elderly who truly need support while simultaneously pursuing new revenue sources — such as taxes on assets or specific consumption taxes — to stabilize the NHI structure’s finances.
The National Health Insurance system has come to an important crossroads. We must address those obstacles with rational and responsible policies, rather than making empty promises driven by partisan election strategies. That new legislation must be blocked the safeguard public health and ensure the sustainability of the NHI system.
Lu Chun-wei is a dermatologist and assistant professor at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
RSS