A remark made by US president-elect Donald Trump stirred controversy, as he accused Taiwan of “stealing” the US chip industry. The statement oversimplifies the realities of global semiconductor production, trade interdependencies and Taiwan’s critical role in the technology supply chain. Clarifying these complexities and framing Taiwan’s role constructively is essential.
Semiconductors are the backbone of modern technology, powering everything from smartphones to electric vehicles, data centers and national defense systems. Taiwan’s leadership in chip manufacturing, particularly through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has enabled technological advances around the globe.
Taiwan’s dominance in the semiconductor industry results from decades of strategic investment, innovation and a collaborative global approach. TSMC produces more than 60 percent of the world’s semiconductors and more than 90 percent of advanced chips. These figures underscore Taiwan’s indispensable role in the technology ecosystem.
TSMC’s success has been mutually beneficial for Taiwan and the US. It supplies critical chips to leading US tech companies, such as Apple, Nvidia and AMD. These partnerships allow them to maintain their competitive edge, supporting millions of jobs in research, design and development in the US.
Moreover, Taiwan has demonstrated its commitment to strengthening the partnership. TSMC’s investments in Arizona are a significant step toward bolstering US semiconductor production capacity. This move reflects Taiwan’s willingness to address US concerns about supply chain resilience and national security.
The semiconductor supply chain exemplifies globalization and interconnected manufacturing networks. Production requires an intricate web of suppliers, engineers and facilities spread across continents. A single chip might involve chemicals from Japan, equipment from the Netherlands, expertise from the US and fabrication in Taiwan. No single country could dominate every aspect of the supply chain.
Instead of fueling misunderstandings, the US should view Taiwan as a partner. Collaborative efforts, such as the CHIPS and Science Act, provide a framework for strengthening domestic production while maintaining ties with trusted allies like Taiwan. Policies encouraging cooperation rather than confrontation would ultimately be more effective in ensuring economic security and technological leadership.
US-China competition has intensified in recent years, with semiconductors emerging as a focal point. Taiwan’s pivotal role in chip production places it at the center of the competition, heightening concerns of economic security and potential disruptions. However, portraying Taiwan as an adversary rather than an ally risks playing into geopolitical narratives that undermine US interests.
Taiwan’s commitment to democratic values, technological leadership and economic cooperation makes it a natural partner for the US. Framing Taiwan’s semiconductor dominance as “threatening” overlooks shared interests. Such rhetoric could also have unintended consequences. Taiwan faces immense external pressures, particularly from China. Misguided accusations risk weakening US-Taiwan ties when solidarity and support are paramount. A more constructive approach would focus on deepening economic, technological and diplomatic cooperation to counter shared challenges.
In response to Trump’s comments, Taiwan has emphasized its commitment to global innovation and partnership. The nation’s success in the semiconductor industry is rooted in its open economy, rule of law and collaborative approach to trade. Taiwan’s advances benefit not only its own economy, but also its global partners.
The semiconductor industry represents a challenge and an opportunity for US-Taiwan relations. As the US seeks to bolster its manufacturing capabilities, it must also recognize the value of its partnership with Taiwan. A balanced approach that combines reshoring efforts with continued collaboration would yield the best outcomes for both nations.
Policymakers should prioritize trade agreements, fostering joint innovation in technology, developing the workforce through institutional partnerships, enhancing supply chain resilience and maintaining strong diplomatic solidarity with Taiwan.
Taiwan’s semiconductor leadership is a boon, not a threat, to global technological progress and US competitiveness. Rather than succumbing to divisive rhetoric, the US should embrace Taiwan as a strategic partner in building a resilient, innovative and secure technology ecosystem.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry should be recognized, celebrated and supported as part of a broader vision for a prosperous and interconnected future.
Darson Chiu is the secretary-treasurer of the Asian Bankers Association.
When Panama severed diplomatic relations with Taiwan and recognized China in 2017, Beijing achieved one of its most important diplomatic victories in Central America. However, nearly a decade later, Panama is demonstrating that diplomatic recognition does not necessarily eliminate Taiwan from a country’s political system. Panama and Taiwan had diplomatic relations for more than 100 years and the goodwill between the countries was displayed last week when Panama’s National Assembly established an interparliamentary exchange group with the Legislative Yuan. Forty-five of the assembly’s 71 lawmakers joined the group, representing more than 60 percent of the legislature. Its members include National Assembly President Shirley
Ten years ago, when I was an undergraduate at National Chung Hsing University (NCHU), there was a referendum on whether to remove a statue of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) from the campus. I wrote to the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) urging faculty, staff and students to vote for its removal. Eventually, the statue was removed from the university. Today, I am filled with emotion at seeing students at Soochow University democratically remove their own statue of Chiang, a figure of authoritarian rule, after it was on display for 48 years The timing is noteworthy, with the nine-in-one local elections approaching.
Beijing has for decades insisted that Taiwan is a matter to be settled between China and the US — or, preferably, by China alone. The strategic environment around Taiwan is making that increasingly difficult. The clearest evidence this week came not from Washington or Beijing, but from Tokyo. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Tuesday met with US President Donald Trump before his summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Taiwan is expected to feature prominently in US-China talks, particularly as Beijing presses Washington over arms sales to Taipei. However, focusing only on what Trump might or might not concede misses the
On the surface, a radio interview with Democratic Progressive Party and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) hosted by television producer Wang Wei-chung (王偉忠) on Sept. 10 came across as an old-time city resident putting questions to a candidate on the campaign trail. Beneath that, however, it was an encounter between two distinct Taiwanese experiences, two generations and two different political vocabularies. Wang grew up in a military dependents’ village. His parents came to Taiwan with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, carrying with them the legacy of war, displacement, the loss of a homeland, and an identification with Chinese culture
RSS