A remark made by US president-elect Donald Trump stirred controversy, as he accused Taiwan of “stealing” the US chip industry. The statement oversimplifies the realities of global semiconductor production, trade interdependencies and Taiwan’s critical role in the technology supply chain. Clarifying these complexities and framing Taiwan’s role constructively is essential.
Semiconductors are the backbone of modern technology, powering everything from smartphones to electric vehicles, data centers and national defense systems. Taiwan’s leadership in chip manufacturing, particularly through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has enabled technological advances around the globe.
Taiwan’s dominance in the semiconductor industry results from decades of strategic investment, innovation and a collaborative global approach. TSMC produces more than 60 percent of the world’s semiconductors and more than 90 percent of advanced chips. These figures underscore Taiwan’s indispensable role in the technology ecosystem.
TSMC’s success has been mutually beneficial for Taiwan and the US. It supplies critical chips to leading US tech companies, such as Apple, Nvidia and AMD. These partnerships allow them to maintain their competitive edge, supporting millions of jobs in research, design and development in the US.
Moreover, Taiwan has demonstrated its commitment to strengthening the partnership. TSMC’s investments in Arizona are a significant step toward bolstering US semiconductor production capacity. This move reflects Taiwan’s willingness to address US concerns about supply chain resilience and national security.
The semiconductor supply chain exemplifies globalization and interconnected manufacturing networks. Production requires an intricate web of suppliers, engineers and facilities spread across continents. A single chip might involve chemicals from Japan, equipment from the Netherlands, expertise from the US and fabrication in Taiwan. No single country could dominate every aspect of the supply chain.
Instead of fueling misunderstandings, the US should view Taiwan as a partner. Collaborative efforts, such as the CHIPS and Science Act, provide a framework for strengthening domestic production while maintaining ties with trusted allies like Taiwan. Policies encouraging cooperation rather than confrontation would ultimately be more effective in ensuring economic security and technological leadership.
US-China competition has intensified in recent years, with semiconductors emerging as a focal point. Taiwan’s pivotal role in chip production places it at the center of the competition, heightening concerns of economic security and potential disruptions. However, portraying Taiwan as an adversary rather than an ally risks playing into geopolitical narratives that undermine US interests.
Taiwan’s commitment to democratic values, technological leadership and economic cooperation makes it a natural partner for the US. Framing Taiwan’s semiconductor dominance as “threatening” overlooks shared interests. Such rhetoric could also have unintended consequences. Taiwan faces immense external pressures, particularly from China. Misguided accusations risk weakening US-Taiwan ties when solidarity and support are paramount. A more constructive approach would focus on deepening economic, technological and diplomatic cooperation to counter shared challenges.
In response to Trump’s comments, Taiwan has emphasized its commitment to global innovation and partnership. The nation’s success in the semiconductor industry is rooted in its open economy, rule of law and collaborative approach to trade. Taiwan’s advances benefit not only its own economy, but also its global partners.
The semiconductor industry represents a challenge and an opportunity for US-Taiwan relations. As the US seeks to bolster its manufacturing capabilities, it must also recognize the value of its partnership with Taiwan. A balanced approach that combines reshoring efforts with continued collaboration would yield the best outcomes for both nations.
Policymakers should prioritize trade agreements, fostering joint innovation in technology, developing the workforce through institutional partnerships, enhancing supply chain resilience and maintaining strong diplomatic solidarity with Taiwan.
Taiwan’s semiconductor leadership is a boon, not a threat, to global technological progress and US competitiveness. Rather than succumbing to divisive rhetoric, the US should embrace Taiwan as a strategic partner in building a resilient, innovative and secure technology ecosystem.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry should be recognized, celebrated and supported as part of a broader vision for a prosperous and interconnected future.
Darson Chiu is the secretary-treasurer of the Asian Bankers Association.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS