Following the controversial passage of amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party legislators, it has been said that President William Lai (賴清德) could apply Article 37 of the Constitution and simply not promulgate the amendments, while the premier could refuse to countersign them into law.
Unfortunately, presidential promulgation and the premier’s countersignature are legal duties, which neither has the power to refuse. Such a refusal would only add to the chaos, break with constitutional procedure and bring the nation closer to a constitutional crisis. This stuff is constitutional law and governance 101.
However, there are three safeguards available to address the problematic new laws.
First, according to Article 3, Section 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution, if the Executive Yuan deems a bill passed by the Legislative Yuan difficult to execute, it has the option, with the approval of the president and within 10 days of the bill’s submission to the Executive Yuan, to request the Legislative Yuan to reconsider the bill. However, if the legislature upholds it, the premier must immediately accept the bill.
Second, according to Articles 42 and 43 of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act, the Constitutional Court has the power to render a preliminary injunction on the problematic law, and can give interested persons the opportunity to state opinions or conduct the necessary investigations on their own.
Third, according to Articles 47 and 49 of the same law, should the president, any of the five branches of government or more than a quarter of legislators believe that a law is in contravention of the Constitution, they can lodge a petition with the Constitutional Court for a judgement declaring the impugned law unconstitutional.
Even though the new amendment to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act stipulates that the number of justices should not be less than 10, once this provision has been suspended and has yet to come into effect, the decision would still be based on the existing majority — the current total of eight justices — not the amended statutory number of 15.
The court therefore still needs to rule on whether the new amendment is constitutional. Legislators often make amendments to the law that are subsequently deemed unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court and declared void. It is only a matter of time until such legislators would come up against a recall motion.
Chuang Sheng-rong is a lawyer.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS