Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese.
The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international competitions. This campaign requires sustained energy, and “Chinese Taipei” must be contested on all fronts.
“Chinese Taipei” has spread from the Olympics to numerous venues where Taiwan is represented internationally in a process known as “Chinese Taipei creep,” a critical part of China’s strategy to erase Taiwan internationally. Sporting associations, airlines and now even the nation of Denmark have all fallen to Chinese Taipei creep. Despite false portrayals in the media as a “compromise” between China and Taiwan, Taiwanese were never consulted and the name is a unilateral surrender to Chinese ultranationalists.
The intent of imposing “Chinese Taipei” is to subsume Taiwan into China in the public imagination.
Taiwan’s baseball champions are starting to fight back. Team Taiwan’s captain Chen Chieh-hsien (陳傑憲) has drawn praise for holding his hands in an empty frame across his chest where his nation’s name should be. The gesture has been widely adopted, including by President William Lai (賴清德).
Japanese media eschewed “Chinese Taipei” for Taiwan, setting an important example for international media. Taiwanese fans also flooded the Tokyo Dome with Taiwanese flags and banners, for all the world to see. Their ability to express their identity freely in Japan contrasts darkly with the cowardice of French authorities this summer.
Taiwanese media and politicians, who had long stuck to the term “Team Chunghwa,” have increasingly used “Team Taiwan” in English and Chinese, an important marker of public support. Even Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians, who have long preferred the “Republic of China” or “Chunghwa” in the international area, have embraced “Team Taiwan.”
The Premier12 has shown that when Taiwanese show up, they can make their voices heard. Taiwanese supporters should continue to vigorously contest all instances of “Chinese Taipei.” China barely exists in the arena of international baseball, so how can it be that Taiwan is still forced to use “Chinese Taipei”?
Taiwanese should utilize the language and advocacy tools of racial justice to hold international media and other organizations to account for discrimination against Taiwanese identity. Athletes should build on the examples set by Chen and Pan Chieh-kai (潘傑楷) to engage in even more ostentatious acts of protest to bring attention to the issue.
This campaign must not be swept away with the ticker tape once the parade is over: Taiwan’s opponent in this fight is relentless and does not go home after nine innings. Around the world, Chinese officials, diplomats and businesspeople work in a coordinated manner to contest any mention of Taiwan. To counter them, Taiwanese must engage in an “everything, everywhere, all at once” campaign, continuously contesting each and every instance of “Chinese Taipei,” and not relenting until Taiwan is allowed to be Taiwan.
Sasha B. Chhabra is an analyst, commentator and media consultant on China’s foreign policy, Taiwanese politics and cross-strait affairs.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS