Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada.
He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東).
Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red” child, who is set to become the Hsu patriarch’s grandson-in-law.
The Mainland Affairs Council has said that Bo Guagua’s entry into Taiwan is lawful and that national security agencies are in control of the situation. The council did not use national security as a reason to refuse his entry into the country, nor has it commented further on his visit. The relative silence surrounding the situation contributes to suspicions.
The hospital is closely tied to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and has long been nicknamed the “Poh-ai Party Headquarters.” Former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) is said to be Hsu’s goddaughter. As a former legislator, she has been accused of proposing several budget cuts to National Yang-ming University Hospital — Poh-ai Hospital’s largest competitor in the area.
The Hsu family’s businesses, including the Lo-Hsu Foundation and Bo ai Enterprise, have had powerful pan-blue heavyweights, such as former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), Yilan County KMT chairwoman Chiou Shu-ti (邱淑媞) and former Taipei Department of Information director Lo Chih-cheng (羅智成), serve in important posts.
It is clear that the Hsu family and the pan-blue camp are closely connected. Even today, the Hsu clan holds power in Yilan County.
Bo Guagua’s cross-strait marriage is a test of loyalty for Xi. In 2012, Bo Guagua’s father, once a popular contender for the CCP leadership and Xi’s greatest political rival, was accused of corruption and expelled from the party, giving Xi an opening to secure the chairmanship. The next year, Bo Xilai was sentenced to life imprisonment on corruption charges.
The contest for the chairmanship painted many CCP officials as little more than a horde of conspiring enemies in Xi’s eyes, in particular former Chinese head of national security Zhou Yongkang (周永康), convicted in 2015 of bribery, and Bo Xilai.
Since his father’s downfall, Bo Guagua has kept a low profile.
After more than 10 years in the West, he graduated from a top-tier university. His sudden appearance has drawn great attention. It is certain to touch upon the extremely fragile nerves of an authoritarian leader who must be filled with trepidation that enemies are colluding in the shadows to take advantage of China’s economic crises to bolster turmoil within its borders.
The office of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was quick to deny ever receiving a wedding invitation, while the “red” media started sweeping the significance of Bo Guagua’s trip under the rug, claiming that the Hsu family had faded from politics.
All this goes to show that the KMT is trying to avoid incurring Xi’s wrath. Who would be willing to attend the wedding at the end of this month? What would be Xi’s response? It will be worth seeing how it unfolds.
It is also worth mentioning that those who oppose Xi do not necessarily oppose the CCP. It goes without saying that Bo Guagua has plenty of reasons to detest Xi, considering the terrible treatment his father has endured, but that by no means shows that he and the CCP have split ways or hold one another in enmity.
Stock phrases such as “opposing Taiwanese separatism” and “reunifying Taiwan” are points of solidarity for all CCP political factions. We would do well to remember that the enemy of our enemy is not necessarily our friend. Regardless of Bo Guagua’s intentions, allowing someone of his background to enter Taiwan is playing with fire.
Hong Tsun-ming is director of the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s Yilan Branch and a specialist of the party’s international division.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS