Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) proposed an amendment to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), attempting to specify that the Constitutional Court should have 15 justices, referring to Article 5 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文).
If the proposal were enacted, it might result in the Constitutional Court being unable to pass judgements.
For example, based on Article 30 of the act — “a judgement shall be rendered by a majority of the total number of the incumbent justices of the Constitutional Court with a quorum of two-thirds of the total number of the incumbent justices thereof taking part in the proceedings.”
A simple majority is needed for the Constitutional Court to pass a judgement, but under the proposed change, 10 would need to agree in each case.
KMT legislators are also boycotting the ratification of judicial nominees, resulting in not enough justices to oversee cases. Should the proposed amendment pass, it would paralyze the Constitutional Court.
It is no wonder that more than 300 lawyers marched in Taipei on Saturday to protest against the proposal and to protect the Constitution.
Article 49 of the act stipulates that one-quarter or more of legislators may lodge a petition with the Constitutional Court for a judgement declaring an impugned statutory law unconstitutional.
According to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法), the “total number” of legislators is based on the actual number of registered legislators in a session, excluding those who resign, leave office or die during the session.
That means Weng’s proposal confuses the meaning of “total number of the incumbent” in the same law and fails in terms of legislative technique.
In reviewing whether a law is unconstitutional, justices give priority to interpretations that are consistent with the intention of the Constitution without undermining the intentions of legislators. This is done to respect the legislature and maintain the stability of the law. Only when a conclusion of constitutionality cannot be reached after all interpretation methods have been exhausted would the justices declare a law to be unconstitutional.
However, the plan to amend the law to raise the vote threshold for the Constitutional Court to make a judgement is a tactic to restrain the justices from declaring laws unconstitutional. This would result in the “order” created by the majority of the Legislative Yuan being maintained — tantamount to allowing lawmakers themselves to decide whether legislation is constitutional.
That would create a legislature without checks and balances, making it difficult to protect human rights.
There should be room for social dialogue and legislative debate on whether it is necessary to amend the act and how to appropriately do so.
Rogue bandits are on the loose, but the political parties keep wasting time and energy on internal conflicts.
Hopefully, the ruling and opposition parties will resolve their differences as soon as possible.
Jiang Zung-shiang is a lawyer and a member of the Judicial Reform Foundation’s executive committee.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
RSS