Before Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico’s rise to power last year, Slovakia was one of Taiwan’s strongest Central European partners. His predecessors Eduard Heger and Ludovit Odor were solid partners of Ukraine and Taiwan, as exemplified by their pro-western posture in the international arena. At the same time, then-Slovakian president Zuzana Caputova advocated for safeguarding democracy from authoritarian countries’ hybrid and conventional threats.
This paradigm was challenged ahead of the parliamentary elections last year, when the Smer party-led opposition promoted a totally different agenda when it comes to diplomatic and international affairs. In particular, it stressed the need to introduce a shift with regards to the Russia-Ukraine war by giving a priority to an immediate diplomatic solution rather than to keep providing weapons to Kyiv.
Within the same foreign policy agenda, Smer’s leader Fico underscored the importance of China as “a trade partner” while avoiding pressuring Beijing on human rights issues: Every state official, president or prime minister, no matter how powerful and influential, always walks down the red carpet in Beijing and seeks business opportunities.
Smer, thanks to the support from the populist Hlas party and far-right Slovak National Party, is now governing the country. In addition to the parliamentary election, another main event in Slovakian politics was the presidential election this year. Fico’s political partner, Slovakian President Peter Pellegrini of Hlas achieved a significant win in the second round against the pro-Western candidate Ivan Korcok. These two electoral results give us a key to understanding recent developments regarding Slovakia’s foreign policy strategy.
Slovakia’s new posture towards China and Taiwan became evident when Fico assumed power last year. The prime minister of Slovakia is one of the most prominent supporters of stronger economic and commercial relations with China, regardless of Beijing’s full economic warfare against the EU.
“China offers enormous trade opportunities and therefore cannot be overlooked,” he said after a meeting between leaders of the central and eastern European countries and China held in November last year.
Fico’s inclination towards China has roots that date back to his first term as prime minister in 2006. Since then, he downplayed Beijing’s human rights violations, and aggressive actions towards Taiwan and other countries in the South China Sea region. As for Fico, indeed, Bratislava should focus on the medium and long term benefits of a closer partnership with China. In that sense, economic interests at stake have to take precedence over any values-oriented concern.
An emblematic manifestation of this new course of action has been Fico’s visit to Bejing from Thursday last week to Tuesday, during which the two countries decided to establish a “Chinese-Slovak strategic partnership.” They said they “have reached broad consensus on their bilateral relations” and that they “do not have any unresolved issues between them.” China and Slovakia issued a joint statement which also included a reference to Taiwan.
In the section indicated as “political domain,” we can see a clear reference to how Slovakia’s foreign policy agenda is working under Fico.
“Slovakia reaffirmed its commitment to the ‘One China policy,’ that there is but one China in the world,” it said. “Slovakia opposes any attempts to interfere in China’s internal affairs, sovereignty and territorial integrity, including Taiwan.”
Two main aspects can be emphasized: A misrepresentation of the “one China policy,” as it is generally applied by the western countries, given that this concept has been used to spread the unfounded theory based on China’s “sovereignty” over Taiwan; the explicit reference to Taiwan as “China’s internal affairs.” It reproduces Bejing’s usual talk about a “Taiwan question” that is “purely one of its domestic affairs.”
This strategic adjustment brought about by Fico’s government does not come as a surprise, given his past actions and statements. What has changed dramatically during these decades is our perception of the stability of the global order and the way in which destabilizing powers such as China or Russia are trying to subvert rather than protect it.
With a Western world increasingly aware of the need to unite in the face of a growing assertiveness from authoritarian actors both in Europe and in Asia, Slovakia has to make a decision between two mutually incompatible international realities. Failing to do so would result in losing a like-minded partner such as Taiwan for many years to come.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS