Some politicians are not sure whether they are coming or going on the issue of Taiwan’s electricity development. They need to stay abreast of developments.
When the Ministry of Economic Affairs said the electricity supply was sufficient, these politicians said it would not be adequate in the future.
When the ministry proposed to import green electricity from the Philippines, they questioned the feasibility of the plan.
When experts said it would be feasible to import green electricity from the Philippines, these same politicians said it would be too costly.
When some international enterprises showed their willingness to purchase green electricity, they said the supply would be insufficient.
The fact is that Taiwan has an adequate electricity supply. If we could increase the supply of green electricity, it would attract foreign investment, too.
During an interpellation session at the Legislative Yuan, a lawmaker questioned whether Taiwan could supply 10 gigawatt-hours of green energy for Nvidia’s potential expansion in the country.
Taiwan produces 20 gigawatt-hours of green electricity per year, possibly reaching 55 gigawatt-hours in 2026, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said.
It is possible to meet Nvidia’s demand, as Nvidia is not requesting a large amount of green energy, he said.
Taiwan is not short of electricity, and yet opposition parties are telling everyone that the nation faces an electricity shortage.
For international enterprises, using green energy is part of their commitment to sustainable development.
Many multinational corporations promote using renewable energy to reduce their carbon emissions and fulfill their obligations to the environment.
Therefore, if Taiwan raised its green energy ratio, it would have a better chance of attracting high-tech and high-value-added industries.
Although green energy is costly, some enterprises are able and willing to pay more. Not only could this alleviate the financial burden on the public in terms of electricity charges, but it could also create room for raising the green energy ratio, leading to a multi-win situation.
Some politicians might not thoroughly understand energy policy, or simply oppose green energy for the sake of opposition, overlooking the fact that they make contradicting statements.
On the one hand, they propose raising the green energy ratio. On the other hand, they oppose green energy because of the potential increase in electricity prices. This is tantamount to wanting to have your cake and eat it too.
These politicians even exaggerate Taiwan’s green energy shortage to mislead international investors, when in fact, Taiwan has a long-term plan for energy development.
There is no risk of electricity shortage. Taiwan needs high-tech corporations, such as Nvidia, rather than labor-intensive industries that bring serious pollution.
Green energy availability is important for multinational corporations when weighing up their investment decisions.
International enterprises would be glad to see Taiwan importing green energy from the Philippines, and would be willing to pay more for it.
The nation cannot ignore industrial transition and developing more green energy if it wants to attract foreign investment. Politicians should support green energy development to create an attractive investment environment and a greener, more sustainable economy.
Wang Chih-chien is a distinguished professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Fion Khan
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS