Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas.
One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe.
The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed completely unaware, but my Chinese friend commented that this was essentially the same thing as a CCP political course aimed at Chinese domestic audiences and Chinese-heavy tour groups such as theirs.
As soon as my friend looked up the guide’s identity, they were quick to see through the veil — the guide was basically a CCP member tasked with disseminating propaganda for the party.
My Chinese friend and one of the Taiwanese group members started to speak up, but the guide did not seem to understand what the issue was, adding that they would not stop with the propaganda.
Over several days, the undercurrent of discontent in the group kept simmering to the point things eventually exploded.
The tour group erupted in a shouting match and several of the Taiwanese group members just wanted to put out the flames, ultimately trying to persuade their protesting group members to “just let the guide speak,” adding that “the guide also has the right to freedom of speech.”
This attempt at placation was risible. What exactly was the level of twisted logic here?
To what extent should Taiwanese tolerate CCP political propaganda without alarm bells going off in their mind?
Is it any wonder that the CCP’s unchecked infiltration is paying massive dividends when people would rather try to smooth over any spats than turn off the torrent of misinformation?
Not long after, my friend could not stand the deluge of nonsense anymore and called the travel agency’s head office in Sydney to lodge a complaint.
The agency then called up the branch travel agency and told them that the guide’s actions were illegal, and that if they were reported to and investigated by local authorities, the travel agency would have its license suspended. After the phone call, the guide finally stopped spouting the propaganda.
In the past few years, China’s propaganda campaigns have been spreading wider and with more zeal. There is essentially no place left untouched by them.
This incident happened in free and open democracies such as Australia and those in northern Europe, but they far more frequently occur in places lacking a democratic mindset.
Taiwanese need to increase their awareness.
Whenever they encounter CCP propaganda overseas, they need to be aware of it and be willing to fight back against the messaging.
Tour guides outside China do have freedom of speech, but tourists also have the right not to be captive audiences to indoctrination attempts. Moreover, the other party is essentially spouting off a spate of lies.
Travelers from democratic societies absolutely have the freedom to refuse to be brainwashed.
Susie Su is a Taiwanese living in Australia.
Translated by Tim Smith
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS