Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas.
One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe.
The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed completely unaware, but my Chinese friend commented that this was essentially the same thing as a CCP political course aimed at Chinese domestic audiences and Chinese-heavy tour groups such as theirs.
As soon as my friend looked up the guide’s identity, they were quick to see through the veil — the guide was basically a CCP member tasked with disseminating propaganda for the party.
My Chinese friend and one of the Taiwanese group members started to speak up, but the guide did not seem to understand what the issue was, adding that they would not stop with the propaganda.
Over several days, the undercurrent of discontent in the group kept simmering to the point things eventually exploded.
The tour group erupted in a shouting match and several of the Taiwanese group members just wanted to put out the flames, ultimately trying to persuade their protesting group members to “just let the guide speak,” adding that “the guide also has the right to freedom of speech.”
This attempt at placation was risible. What exactly was the level of twisted logic here?
To what extent should Taiwanese tolerate CCP political propaganda without alarm bells going off in their mind?
Is it any wonder that the CCP’s unchecked infiltration is paying massive dividends when people would rather try to smooth over any spats than turn off the torrent of misinformation?
Not long after, my friend could not stand the deluge of nonsense anymore and called the travel agency’s head office in Sydney to lodge a complaint.
The agency then called up the branch travel agency and told them that the guide’s actions were illegal, and that if they were reported to and investigated by local authorities, the travel agency would have its license suspended. After the phone call, the guide finally stopped spouting the propaganda.
In the past few years, China’s propaganda campaigns have been spreading wider and with more zeal. There is essentially no place left untouched by them.
This incident happened in free and open democracies such as Australia and those in northern Europe, but they far more frequently occur in places lacking a democratic mindset.
Taiwanese need to increase their awareness.
Whenever they encounter CCP propaganda overseas, they need to be aware of it and be willing to fight back against the messaging.
Tour guides outside China do have freedom of speech, but tourists also have the right not to be captive audiences to indoctrination attempts. Moreover, the other party is essentially spouting off a spate of lies.
Travelers from democratic societies absolutely have the freedom to refuse to be brainwashed.
Susie Su is a Taiwanese living in Australia.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS