Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas.
One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe.
The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed completely unaware, but my Chinese friend commented that this was essentially the same thing as a CCP political course aimed at Chinese domestic audiences and Chinese-heavy tour groups such as theirs.
As soon as my friend looked up the guide’s identity, they were quick to see through the veil — the guide was basically a CCP member tasked with disseminating propaganda for the party.
My Chinese friend and one of the Taiwanese group members started to speak up, but the guide did not seem to understand what the issue was, adding that they would not stop with the propaganda.
Over several days, the undercurrent of discontent in the group kept simmering to the point things eventually exploded.
The tour group erupted in a shouting match and several of the Taiwanese group members just wanted to put out the flames, ultimately trying to persuade their protesting group members to “just let the guide speak,” adding that “the guide also has the right to freedom of speech.”
This attempt at placation was risible. What exactly was the level of twisted logic here?
To what extent should Taiwanese tolerate CCP political propaganda without alarm bells going off in their mind?
Is it any wonder that the CCP’s unchecked infiltration is paying massive dividends when people would rather try to smooth over any spats than turn off the torrent of misinformation?
Not long after, my friend could not stand the deluge of nonsense anymore and called the travel agency’s head office in Sydney to lodge a complaint.
The agency then called up the branch travel agency and told them that the guide’s actions were illegal, and that if they were reported to and investigated by local authorities, the travel agency would have its license suspended. After the phone call, the guide finally stopped spouting the propaganda.
In the past few years, China’s propaganda campaigns have been spreading wider and with more zeal. There is essentially no place left untouched by them.
This incident happened in free and open democracies such as Australia and those in northern Europe, but they far more frequently occur in places lacking a democratic mindset.
Taiwanese need to increase their awareness.
Whenever they encounter CCP propaganda overseas, they need to be aware of it and be willing to fight back against the messaging.
Tour guides outside China do have freedom of speech, but tourists also have the right not to be captive audiences to indoctrination attempts. Moreover, the other party is essentially spouting off a spate of lies.
Travelers from democratic societies absolutely have the freedom to refuse to be brainwashed.
Susie Su is a Taiwanese living in Australia.
Translated by Tim Smith
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
The Honduran elections seem to have put China on defense. The promises of trade and aid have failed to materialize, industries are frustrated, and leading candidate Salvador Nasralla, who has increased his lead in the polls, has caused Beijing to engage in a surge of activity that appears more like damage control than partnership building. As Nasralla’s momentum has grown, China’s diplomacy, which seems to be dormant since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 2023, has shown several attempts to avoid a reversal if the Liberal or the National party — which also favor Taipei — emerge as winners in the
RSS